6 Famous Car Brands General Motors Failed
General Motors has overseen a huge number of brands since the early 1900s. Some were successful; some still are in North America at least. But a generous handful of household names have also fallen beneath GM’s enormous wheels; sacrificed at the altar of industry in order to give others a better chance of survival.
But how many of these former household names were mismanaged? How many lacked investment at the right times? How many were simply ignored by GM until it was too late? Let’s take a peek into GM’s post-WWII history to find out why so many big names collapsed on the same corporation’s watch.
Holden
Holden once had the Australasian market sewn up, easily up there with Ford as one of the biggest and most sought-after names in cars. You were either a Ford guy or a Holden guy. Holden made some great cars out of Chevrolet-donated parts, and in the 21st century became something resembling a General Motors skunkworks with products like the Monaro and the Ute.
GM didn’t keep up its commitment to Australian and Kiwi buyers and the products Holden started to inherit from Chevrolet became limper and blander. Hot versions of the Commodore aside, by the mid-2010s the Holden range really was a dreary thing; unfit for purpose and an affront to the cool and desirable cars of decades past. A lack of proper product-planning has formally ended Holden.
Pontiac
When you advertise something as your sportiest brand; your performance wing, and then fail to invest in it properly, there’s only one end result possible. Pontiac was billed as the sports car maker in the GM stable; the performance division built on the likes of the Firebird and GTO. It sat above Chevrolet in GM’s hierarchy and was once one of the most emotive names you could put on a car.
Sadly its owners didn’t splash the cash when it came to keeping Pontiac’s models current. The 2000s saw it turn out a chain of utterly depressing minivans and sedans that were lukewarm at best. Americans just stopped buying them and Pontiac was axed after the calamitous recession hit at the end of the noughties. Perhaps if it hadn’t been producing such tat for the previous 20 years it might have survived.
Oldsmobile
Oldsmobile was one of the oldest surviving car marques in the world before it was shut down. Founded in 1897, it grew steadily and successfully with the trials and tribulations of the 20th century. Arguably it was most successful between the 1960s and 1980s with a rich history and boundary-pushing technology always in the mix.
It sold a million cars in 1985 after creating the innovative Quad 4 inline-four engine in 1984; an engine that led to the wild Aerotech speed record project. It seemed like Oldsmobile could do no wrong, but then GM decided to position it directly against the rampant Japanese car scene which was making vast leaps with every new model. The great Oldsmobile was hopelessly under-prepared and woefully outgunned. The brand quickly lost its way, flailed for a while but ultimately collapsed.
Hummer
GM bought the Hummer brand from AM General and quickly marketed the H1, whose development had mostly been completed already. It was a triumphant, if impractical, expression of American assumed superiority. You could easily picture Donald Trump in one.
Not enough people actually wanted a military-spec SUV, though, so the H1 (above) was diluted into the much more common H2 and eventually the half-hearted H3 but the moves were too little, too late. Yet again, GM had failed to move quickly enough to keep a brand alive, leaving it with the wrong vehicles at the wrong time. In the end the 2008 recession was an excuse that GM was grateful for; it ended Hummer at the first chance. A rebirth of sorts is now on the cards.
Bedford
In the 1920s Bedford was called British Chevrolet. It first started making Chevrolet Bedford-badged vans in 1929, and typically of Chevrolet at that time its products used an extremely advanced and smooth OHV straight-six that proved good enough for two decades of service. The Chevrolet name was dropped in 1931, when Bedford became its own brand.
It was closely aligned to Vauxhall and even used a griffin on its logo. It got sweet F-A investment through the 1960s and 1970s, though, so as rival companies were moving the truck game on in leaps and bounds, Bedford was building antiques. For whatever reason, GM did not keep pace and they let Bedford die. Perhaps they lacked the management expertise or the know-how in the European truck market. Either way, Bedford is dead(ford).
Saturn
GM set Saturn up as a direct competitor to the Japanese after realising it was too difficult to A) get its existing cars to be as affordable and reliable as the Japanese ones, and B) convince the public that they succeeded.
Run badly with too little focus from the start, Saturn was never profitable. It never really got going; its pace of development couldn’t match the quality and value improvements being made by imports and it technically struggled on until 2010, although production had been ended a year earlier. Saturn never had a chance.
GM in Europe
We couldn’t make this list without also mentioning some of the other brands GM has let down. Saab was a maker of genuinely brilliant cars that unfortunately had to share their oily bits with some of the very worst cars GM ever made, like the early-2000s Vectra.
Saab’s complete unwillingness to tolerate the utter uselessness of the products they were given, and the resulting in-house re-engineering processes, resulted in gross overspends year after year. Eventually, GM had had enough and sold Saab to Spyker, who quickly realised what a mistake they’d made and had the company file for bankruptcy. We still very much blame GM for its downfall.
As for Opel and Vauxhall, GM never really seemed to understand how to make cars that Europeans really wanted to buy. Surely it wasn’t difficult: ask people what they like about Volkswagens and Toyotas and then create the same things. Such basics seemed beyond GM, though, and every new model that came out seemed to hammer home the idea that Opel and Vauxhall were happy with being bang-average at best, with a few very notable exceptions like the VX220.
Opel and Vauxhall were sold to PSA towards the end of the 2010s and the first PSA-based cars to come from them look like a vast improvement. Was it really ever that hard to make them work? GM is now out of Europe and not looking to come back. It has a lot of wounds to lick and a lot of lessons to learn before it can think of returning.
Comments
Daewoo?
The title says “famous”, not “infamous”
Daewoo is still alive in Korea tho. And i believe it is also selling cars in russia
The Saturn one is just a rebadged Opel Astra converted into a sedan… As are most gm products… You start to see the problem
Well everyone does that GM just reads the spark notes.
It’s actually a Vectra. You can REALLY see the problem where you begin re-badging Pieces of S* like the Vectra
GM is literally the EA of automotive industry. Buy brands under them and then shut them down because of awful business model that just works against them and then blame consumers for all their losses. 🤦♂️
Its sad that Saab went down the drain it was an innovative car company but it just couldnt last :( I should know the car I first started to learn to drive in was a Saab, and my family had 4 of them, but it wasnt to be sadly
Enter your comment…
I admire Saab for their commitment towards vehicle safety (just like Volvo), and I loved seeing their cars when I first saw them in person while visiting Sweden and Norway. It is really sad that the company doesn’t exist anymore.
How to GM:
make/buy way too many brands to manage
some brands start performing well
load them with sh!tty badge-engineered cars which are totally different from the brand’s ethos
wHy ArEn’t thEy SeLLing WeLl anYMoRe?
pulls the plug
Also fail to properly cater to foreign markets demands. Also just half-ass anything that isn’t a performance car.
what if they arent selling well? what if the badge engineering is a way to kill off a company slowly?
Japanese cars may be more reliable but their quality is just as bad as the Americans, maybe worse. Button labels rubbing off in 3 years, weather stripping and upholstery coming off in 5. Engine mounts giving out. Never understood why they get a pass for this.
They get a pass because British and American cars of the 70s were SO bad, that even a bad Japanese car was far better than a British or American one.
If you want genuinely reliable cars these days, you buy Korean.
Thank goodness I’m not the only one feeling that Japanese brands have deteriorated in their standards! They used to run the world during the 1990s, but now, their management seems to have started compromising on those very values that made them the world-beaters that they previously were, just to thrash out more volumes.
Pontiac is the only one that upsets me here, the only American brand I really enjoyed.
Why GM decided to keep Buick and GMC alive and kill of Pontiac is beyond me. Pontiac had so much great history and iconic names to it. And GMC is 100% just badge engineering. Such a shame
Why GM decided to keep Buick and GMC alive and kill of Pontiac is beyond me.
The survival of Buick can be describe with one word: China. The Chinese are extremely hooked up on that brand.
Also GMC didn’t get the axe because it has been consistently selling well the two kinds of cars that sell like hot cakes in murrica: SUVs and pickup trucks.
Or how it’s known by them, Monday morning.
GM is like the Micosoft; greedy ; buy brands that work against them to kill them