10 Terrible Versions Of Amazing Cars

When a manufacturer builds an incredible car, they'll often offer a number of variants to appeal to a wider audience. Unfortunately, they sometimes ruin the car in the process
10 Terrible Versions Of Amazing Cars

Just because you’ve made a great car, that doesn’t mean it’ll stay great. Over the course of automotive history, car makers have struck gold and then somehow converted it into tin with their choice of specifications. Here are ten examples of when they got it very wrong.

Ford Mustang Ecoboost

Ford Mustang Ecoboost
Ford Mustang Ecoboost

After becoming an automotive icon in the USA and around the world, the Ford Mustang finally arrived in Britain in 2014. Petrolheads rejoiced, but the big V8 engine was ever so slightly taxing at the UK’s pricier-than-America fuel pumps. No problem, Ford confidently thought – we’ll stick in a 2.3-litre, four-cylinder Ecoboost engine. That’ll keep everyone happy.

Well, it did bring fuel costs down. But a muscle car without any muscle is just… a car. It’s not that the 2.3 Ecoboost is bad – it’s pretty good, in fact – it just doesn’t suit the Mustang at all. A big engine is integral to what makes the Mustang a Mustang. And if you don’t want that engine, why would you want a Mustang at all?

Toyota Supra

A80 Toyota Supra - front
A80 Toyota Supra - front

In full-fat twin-turbocharged mode, the A80 Supra is an absolute animal. It’s a tuner’s dream project with a 2JZ engine that’s ripe for more horsepower. However, the likes of The Fast and Furious tend to gloss over the fact that the car also came with an entry-level model, which utilised a naturally aspirated version of the 2JZ inline-six.

It made a fairly healthy 220bhp, but in a relatively heavy car that made it rather gutless compared to the 326bhp pumped out by the double-blower version. Quite why anyone bought it, we’re not sure.

Nissan 240SX Convertible

Nissan 240SX Convertible - side
Nissan 240SX Convertible - side

Take a car revered since the 1990s for its handling and fun, and make it less fun, with worse handling. That’s the S13 Nissan 240SX 'Silvia' Convertible, a car that loses structural rigidity and adds extra weight and mechanical complication over the excellent coupe model. And it looks rubbish, too. And the roof leaks.

Still, at least you can enjoy the fresh air while regretting your decisions.

Ferrari 208 GTB

Ferrari 208 GTB drawing
Ferrari 208 GTB drawing

The Ferrari 308 GTB sits high in the pantheon of cars branded with the prancing horse. It was driven by Magnum PI, it had a lightweight fibreglass body and a glorious V8 engine that made north of 250bhp, which in the early 80s was really quite a lot. But then the fibreglass was replaced with steel, attention to detail went through the floor, and eventually the engine got smaller and less powerful – wearing a 208 GTB badge in its native Italy it coughed out just 155bhp from a 2.0-litre V8 downsized for tax reasons. Less a prancing horse, more an ailing donkey.

Nissan Skyline R32 GXi

R32 Nissan Skyline GXi
R32 Nissan Skyline GXi

Few words moisten the petrolhead appetite like 'Nissan Skyline' But don’t get too excited about this one. The GXi version of Nissan's dare-we-say-iconic R32-generation Skyline ditched its turbocharger, chucked the four-wheel drive that made it rocket off the line, and added two extra doors at the back. Under the bonnet was a weedy four-pot engine that just about managed to develop 90bhp. Rarely has the potential-to-disappointment ratio been so massive.

BMW E31 850i

BMW E31 8-series
BMW E31 8-series

Yes yes, we can hear the screams of outrage from here. But hear us out. In theory, the flagship 8-series engine was a great option, with a stonking V12 under the bonnet and dashing good looks. But in practice BMW's 5.0-litre V12 was heavy, which knackered the handling, overly complicated, which meant it broke down a lot, and not very good even when it worked, with distinctly underwhelming performance. That meant that bragging rights over the number of cylinders you’ve got is about the only thing going for it.

BMW E46 M3 Convertible SMG

E46 BMW M3 Convertible
E46 BMW M3 Convertible

Oh, more screams of outrage? Look, OK, the drop-top E46 BMW M3 isn’t bad. It’s just that it’s quite a bit worse than all the other BMW M3s of that era. And that goes double when it’s fitted with the SMG automatic gearbox. At the time heralded as F1 tech in a road car, it was little more than a robotised manual, which is one of the worst of all the automatic gearbox technologies. It does nothing that isn’t better in a manual gearbox and completely ruins an otherwise brilliant car.

Tesla Model S 40kWh

10 Terrible Versions Of Amazing Cars

Before the Model 3 came out, Tesla customers wanted a more affordable car than the moderately pricey Model S. Tesla’s solution was a Model S with hardly any standard equipment and a tiny 40kWh battery, which gave it a measly official range of 139 miles. It wasn’t supercharger compatible either. Unsurprisingly, it was on sale for less than a year before Tesla withdrew it.

Toyota GR Yaris

10 Terrible Versions Of Amazing Cars

Cease your outrage – yes, we know that the Toyota GR Yaris that we get here is excellent. But in Japan, Toyota sells another version that ditches the hardcore model’s four-wheel drive. And its engine. And therefore most of the things that make it fun. It’s front-wheel drive and has a three-cylinder, non-turbo, 1.5-litre engine with 118bhp and a CVT. In fairness, we’ve never driven it, but we can’t imagine it’s even a shadow of the GR Yaris that we get here.

BMW E36 M3 (US spec)

E36 BMW M3 - front
E36 BMW M3 - front

The E36-generation BMW M3 is an iconic ‘90s performance car, but the model we got in Europe (pictured) was considerably better than that sent out to those poor Americans. In the USA, the E36 M3 was severely neutered, with a different, far less powerful engine – 240bhp instead of 320-odd – in a bid to make it more affordable. YouTube favourite Jason Cammisa would have you believe it’s the one to go for, but we don’t think his arguments about value for money would stack up in a pub argument about horsepower.

Sponsored Posts

Comments

DrivingNirvana (johnmay)

Could you imagine having a TT Rx7/supra with a proper dual clutch transmission , I’d buy it !

03/17/2016 - 10:52 |
0 | 1
Anonymous

You forgot that “car”

03/17/2016 - 11:00 |
20 | 5
SavvannaFilms

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

They said amazing cars. I don’t think that fits in the category

03/17/2016 - 11:13 |
36 | 0
Anonymous

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

No joke I saw a Swagon like this 😂

03/18/2016 - 05:09 |
0 | 0
Street Cars

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

I don’t want to butt-hurt anyone. But they drive fine.
They just look aweful, but the group they are designed for don’t want sporty cars…

03/20/2016 - 16:27 |
0 | 0
One Lap Kings

I’m going to have to disagree with the NA auto supra. It seems like a drag racers dream. You don’t pay the premium for the twin turbo manuals, the NA 2Jz is know to be just as strong as the turbo variant if you add forced induction, and with a little work the auto is very potent to get you a very quick 1/4 mile pass. Wouldn’t be my first choice, but there is still more potential there than most of the other cars on this list.

03/17/2016 - 11:09 |
7 | 0
Anonymous

I quite like the the shifts on on the FRS an and brz. I didn’t didn’t feel like they were slow to react at all.

03/17/2016 - 11:15 |
0 | 0
Thug Bird

I’m not sure if this can be considered a loophole, but surely as for cars like the Supra and the RX-7 (which are coincidentally both my dream cars) you could do a manual swap eventually? Since their automatic transmission iterations are significantly cheaper than a manual counterpart of the same condition.

squawk

03/17/2016 - 11:18 |
4 | 0

Yes, it seems this article is mostly auto-bashing. If you were to bash any Mazda for being strictly auto, it would be the JC Cosmo which featured a 20b 3-rotor twin turbo. Darren would have had a better argument pointing out the fact that the n/a 13b made about 155hp - that was a big disappointment for me when I was shopping for an FC.

03/17/2016 - 20:03 |
2 | 0
MK2_guy

Golf Mk2 fire and ice! Look at thst interior!

03/17/2016 - 11:19 |
4 | 1

still good since it’s manual

08/31/2016 - 14:40 |
0 | 0
wild_toilet 🇧🇷 (Miata Addict)

Don’t forget that the R34 also came in automatic.

03/17/2016 - 11:37 |
0 | 0
Max Collins

Wouldn’t call a n/a supra cheap to run, still only get about 20-25 mpg from it when being good with it

03/17/2016 - 11:46 |
0 | 0
Darude Her Right In The Sandstorm™

If nobody else wants them, I’ll take them with content

Auto or manual doesn’t matter to me, even soft tops

03/17/2016 - 11:47 |
0 | 0
Max fliearman

Phil is what you want to avoid

03/17/2016 - 12:11 |
1 | 0