The Aston Martin Vantage Is A Bittersweet Revolution I Can't Love
I love the old Aston Martin Vantage. It was never the fastest, the most exciting or the most exotic sports car on the planet, but it looked stunning and made an epic noise from both eight- and 12-cylinder normally-aspirated engines. That was enough.
It had a priceless combination of badge, performance and raw emotion; something that even Porsche has struggled for with ordinary 911s. Everyone loved the Vantage even if they wouldn’t buy one with their own money, while some people still say Stuttgart’s finest is a bit boring (totally untrue, but people have their opinions).
They loved it because of they way it looked. Small, totally neat from nose to tail and with just about perfect proportions, the Vantage was arguably the best-looking member of a family of supermodels, from the first model to the last. Whether you picked the more refined look of the V8 or the more muscular, angry-looking V12 with its bonnet vents and loud colour options, it was pretty much the most perfect piece of styling of modern times.
That presented Aston Martin with a problem. The DB9, whose design was started by Ian Callum and finished by Henrik Fisker, spawned the template that all subsequent Astons of the era had to follow. Arguably it was perfected with the tight, purposeful Vantage, but the family grew with the DBS, Rapide, Virage and the Vanquish, all of which looked so similar that the untrained eye wouldn’t know the difference. It had become too much of a good thing.
What do you do when you’ve had a perfect relationship but you feel like its time has run out? You just have to make a clean break, and that’s what Aston has done. It’s moving on, as the market effectively forces it to. Not even styling perfection can keep the buyers flowing in, if it fails to change with the times.
So things have changed. The new Vantage isn’t the standard-bearer; that honour went to the DB11 that preceded it by a good few months. The switch from Aston Martin V8 to AMG V8 has been well documented elsewhere so we won’t dwell on it here, but we will look at the styling. Because, on this car, it matters.
You might have noticed that it takes some pretty hefty cues from the DB10 concept we saw in the Bond movie Spectre. Actually, it’s the other way around. The future Vantage had already been designed in 2015, when the film was released, and the DB10 was based on that. It was a handy way of gauging public opinion with a good few years spare to change things up if needed.
The production car’s massive, ‘bottomless’ grille design is… different. The headlight shape, viewed face-on, is a little bland. The curves running from the sharp single leading edge all the way to the back corners of the bonnet are lovely and the car’s silhouette is straight out of the top-drawer, but this is a fundamentally less attractive car than its predecessor. By quite a lot, I’d say, although it’s always subjective and the new kid is hardly ugly.
Is the turbocharged engine good? Yes, by all accounts. Will it drive well? Again, no question. Does it make me desperately want a used one in the future? No. Sadly, no it doesn’t. I know the style revolution had to happen. The models needed to be differentiated more, and to Aston’s credit that seems to be what’s happening, but I’m just not in love with the new one. I’m supposed to be, and part of me knows that, but my mind, my eyes and my heart still belong to the one who came before.
Excuse me while I fire up the classifieds and ugly cry over my keyboard.
Comments
Yeah the rear is quite nice but the chickencoop wire laden front is bleh…
The most common thing happening among the current super & hyper car producers is that they are focusing on aerodynamics more and less on aesthetic design. Look at Aston Martin Valkyrie, new NSX, new Ford GT, any modern McLaren, all most every EV cars…………the list goes on. From my perspective, only Ferrari & Lambo have somehow managed to hold their styling icon on their current production cars. Koenigsegg & Pagani are the best example of how to make aesthetic car and yet hold performance.
It looks like it’s trying a bit too hard. The old vantage didn’t need to try it was just beautiful from the outset.
The db10 should have been used for the front maybe?
Especially the headlights.
reminds me of the new MX-5
Other way around, the original Vantage’s design was used to build the DB10 when the Vantage was still in development
the front looks like a nd mx-5 that was stung by a wasp
give it some time
Exactly
I’m sorry, but if you are able to hate a car just based on it’s looks, than you are absolutely mad.
True that, don’t understand all the downvotes smh
No one here said that they hated the entire car. This post is only about the design.
The headlights are what brings the whole thing down. If they were more similar to the DB10 concept’s lights, it would look way better.
I personally quite like it. It’s different and yes the old Vantage was a beauty with its timeless design that probably will never be eclipsed by future Astons.
But if they had to change it, they’ve done a bloody good job. It looks interesting and most importantly it looks distinct: in relation to other Astons (finally, you won’t mix up the DB model and Vantage when you see them on the road) and to other cars. Just give it some time…
Same