Car Makers Need To Stop Using The Word 'Autonomous' Because People Actually Believe It
There’s a problem hiding in plain sight in today’s increasingly machine-moderated car world. It’s the word ‘autonomous.’
This word, defined loosely as something free of external control or influence, is being bandied around in what seems like almost every press release these days, but car makers need to stop it. Right now.
The problem is that there is no true autonomy in cars yet. All the years of development so far aren’t enough. Drivers, as we’re finding out regularly with Autopilot-activate crashes, can’t rely totally on the systems yet. And if you can’t rely on the system, what’s the point of it?
To be fair, systems like Autopilot are superb backups. They can see beneath the car in front, or hit the brakes before the human driver even knows why. Having them turned on is a no-brainer. The problem seems to arrive at the point where people start to think they can let go of the wheel.
Letting the computer do the driving is, as things stand, a bad idea. Uber’s test car saw a human being directly in its way but decided not to avoid her. Tesla’s Autopilot recently failed to see a massive, red fire truck. There’s probably nothing in the code to specifically suggest a reason why; it just didn’t. Humans make silly mistakes all the time, but so, it seems, do machines. Right now it seems like we’re just trading one kind of fallible for another. Another that’s out of our control, and for whose mistakes we get blamed anyway.
This is why talking about any kind of autonomy in cars right now is just wrong. The systems are still fallible but the more we talk about self-driving cars, the more the idea becomes normalised and the more people will blindly believe they simply work… until they don’t, that is, and someone ends up in hospital or worse. Judging by the news, people are beginning to switch off and put complete faith in the car. That’s proving to be a dangerous situation.
At best we should be thinking of any supposed autonomous driving systems as glorified cruise control. Sure, you can take your feet off the pedals, but a hand on the steering wheel is always a good idea (and often a requirement of the system) and you should always be focused on the road. You never know what kind of mess your expensive machine might get itself into when left to its own devices.
Temporary road markings, longitudinal cracks in the road surface, bright, low sun or even dirt on sensors can all deceive various systems. They might have your back, but they’re certainly not ready to take the lead.
Drivers still need to concentrate on driving, even if they’re technically not in control. To do that, the average human needs to be active in the process; managing steering at the least. By ending what’s becoming a frivolous use of the word ‘autonomous,’ car makers could hopefully remind people that there’s no such thing as a safe or totally competent self-driving car yet, and that drivers can’t simply turn to their smartphones believing they’re protected.
Autonomous cars that never, ever have accidents might happen one day. On the other hand, the infinite variables across an entire planet of roads and varying conditions will most likely always find occasional flaws in any amount of complex software. It’s crucial that people remember that, and maintain direct control of the car. Autonomy in cars is a myth, and it’s high time car makers stopped pretending otherwise.
Comments
Exactly robots should never take the place of human drivers
You are gonna get so many downvotes…
But I agree with you.
I disagree. Just because the robots aren’t perfect yet, that doesn’t mean we should jump to conclusions and completely lose faith in the idea of self-driving cars. The thing is, new technology isn’t immediately foolproof. It always has kinks (sometimes fatal ones) that have to be worked out over time. And by over time, I don’t mean in a three-week period.
Point is, eventually autonomous technology is going to overtake human capabilities for driving, no matter how much the petrolhead community protests it.
Did you know people wanted to ban Those new fangled “auto carriages’ back in the early 1900’s because they were so dangerous, perhaps we should have left the driving to the horses.
just like var in football its dumb and should never be implemented
People’s minds tend to get so comfortable at times…
A bit too comfortable. Companies like Tesla that use these “autopilot” systems are hurting themselves and the technology by making misleading statements and advertisements about its capabilities and how it should be used.
normal people call this type of branding “Over exaggeration”
That’s every product marking for you…
Tesla Autopilot is basically Cruise Control ++
Car Company gives car a basic lane keep assist
Ads:
THE MOST REVOLUTIONARY AUTONOMOUS SAFETY!
*EVER!
IN THE WOOOORLD
Machines don’t make mistakes, they do what humans tell them to do, but humans make mistakes when they make the machines.
Autonomous driving doesn’t have to be perfect, just better than humans, road fatalities went up recently due to all the distracted driving, one thing computers never do is get distracted…
Autonomous vehicles? Fk them, that’s why we have public transport. Public transport can be afforded by almost everyone while a dumb autonomous vehicle - you have to buy it and maintain it only to do what public transport does. What the actual f? Some people are that stupid that they invest in such a pointless idea… And if they make autonomous vehicles and people actually buy them, I will lose faith in humanity. No more bus drivers, train drivers, pilots, cab drivers, police car drivers, ambulance drivers, firetruck drivers, pilots, sailors will be required. Millions of people will lose their jobs. Just because of a stupid invention. Downvote however much you want, this is how I feel about autonomous vehicles.
Yes, but not all local governments can afford to fund a public transport system.
a better example would be a ride hailing service like Lyft or Uber
as public transport wont exactly take you from A to B
what about autonomous public transport?
Autopilot is disgusting. Yes this comment will get downvotes whatever
Autopilot isn’t disgusting, it’s just a spruiced up, misleading version of cruise control.
Downvoted it like you requested
The term you are looking for is ‘semi-autonomous’. These vehicles require supervision by human drivers who must be able to regain control at any moment. Semi-autonomous vehicles allow drivers to relax in a similar way to cruise control, and allow manufacturers to collect huge quantities of data from real driving scenarios which massively speeds up the development of fully autonomous vehicles. Only when ‘fully-autonomous’ level 5 vehicles arrive will the driver be able to forget about driving. I think all drivers should be aware of this.