Here's Why 2017 Will Go Down In Automotive History, For Better Or Worse
This year has been one of immense change in the car world. You could, and probably should, call it progress. But never before has automotive progress been presented in such dichotomy.
Let’s start with the McLaren 720S. Justifiably announced as Evo Magazine’s outright car of the year, we’ve been typing orgasms about it all year long since its launch about 10 months ago. Faster, more engaging and just generally more super than even the old 675LT, which itself earned ridiculous praise, the 720S is arguably the prime example of the kind of leaps we’ve seen this year.
We saw it set a 9.7-second quarter-mile, pump out way more power than advertised on the dyno and obliterate the previously unstoppable Tesla Model S P100D in drag races. The more we looked at it, the prettier it seemed. The more desirable. It’s a legend in its own time and has taken the fight to Porsche and Ferrari in a way that the once untouchable kings of the supercar scene must have found terrifying.
We’ve also witnessed the evolution of a new generation of hot hatchbacks. Now dealing out over 300bhp per car, these everyday heroes are as fast as the supercars of yesteryear. The fifth-generation Honda Civic Type R was 2017’s best, emerging after just two years in production for the slightly half-baked MkIV. Like the 720S, it moved the goal posts farther than anyone could have predicted.
The good news and fun times were tempered by a spate of ugly stories that unfolded over the summer. Total bans on internal combustion-powered cars in smog-blighted Paris and bicycle-friendly Oxford joined similar countrywide plans in France and the UK. The article I wrote criticising the city-scale bans earned me a sizeable Twitter backlash from the political enviro-Left, but I stand by every word.
These stories brought the uncomfortable future reality of a petrol- and diesel-free country home to roost. While hybrids are safe, for now, anything powered solely by fossil fuels will be banned from new-car showrooms. Car makers have to adapt. In fairness they have plenty of time to do it, but the legislators have made 2017 the year that put an expiry date on many countries’ love affairs with burning oil-based liquids in cars. We made a short list of the awesome machines we now know we’ll lose forever. Sniff.
We come to the end of the year in mixed spirits, then. Pure-breed supercars like the 720S are better than ever. We’ve reached new heights in design, performance and lap times. We’ve had plenty to celebrate in 2017, and celebrate we did.
There’s an inescapable bitterness at the back of our throats, though, caused by the knowledge that time for the cars we’ve known and loved is running out. Sure, hybrid hypercars are showing us that there’ll be no shortage of speed in the post-petrol world, and we don’t doubt that a lot of cars will simply get by as mild hybrids with the minimum of electrical involvement, but huge change never comes without a cost. As petrolheads, we’re the ones set to pay that cost.
The question is this: when we all reach retirement, will we look back on 2017 as the year the human race achieved momentous environmental progress, or the year we lost something wonderful?
Comments
Kill me please
We’re all driving rolling computerized turbocharged hybrids that are no more engaging than a videogame. CVT’s Turbos, 4 Cylinders, Hybrids and Electric cars are more common than anything else. It’s a purists nightmare. I can say with 100 percent honesty, not single car released this year that I was mildly interested in. Its all Bullcrap!
Also the year that korean car manfauctrers made some kick ass cars
All the comments arguing about the ban on ICE vehicles, like its going to worsen the condition of the environment. Smh
Why 2017 was bad: We’re leaving behind the Viper
Best Dating club - http://v.ht/y1Ky
fcking leftists try and ruin everyone’s fun smh