Mandatory Speed Limiters Could Price Us Out Of Interesting Older Cars
There was only ever one topic that this weekend’s blog was going to cover. The EU’s decision to impose mandatory and active speed limiters upon the whole continent from 2022, albeit on new cars only (for now), got you talking.
Whatever you think of the idea, or the potential for random, incalculable failures of the technology like those we already see today (speed limit recognition right now is patchy at best, after all), that’s not what we want to talk about right now. There’s another issue centred around ‘sporty’ cars.
Cars with a decent slug of power, say, from 200 ponies upwards, allow more freedom on the open road. They make overtaking easier, they make quick getaways from the traffic lights – useful where lanes merge soon afterwards – safer and they usually pack better brakes, grippier tyres and generally communicate better with drivers.
On the other hand, breaking the speed limit in such cars can be an inevitability. Whether it’s in order to safely get past traffic moving at 10mph under the speed limit, or simply enjoying the car on a quiet country road, these things happen. To arbitrarily say that any and all instances of speeding are inherently unsafe isn’t true, and there’s precisely zero evidence to support any such sweeping statement.
Speed limiters will club powerful cars over the head harder than it will hit ordinary biffabouts. A limiter will act as a leash, holding the car back and canning that sense of freedom that many people buy more powerful cars for. At that point, the question will arise: why bother buying one at all? People will be able to buy a stylish car with a basic engine for a lot less, if they’ll all do the same speeds.
It’s very possible that this will cause a lot of headaches at Porsche, Aston Martin, Ferrari, McLaren, Lamborghini and anywhere else that power and/or freedom are integral parts of the image. Even the more attainable options like the Golf GTI, the Hyundai i30 N and the BMW M135i may suddenly become about as desirable as foot rot. What would you be paying the extra for, really?
Instead, heads will turn to the classifieds, where dwell cars without the speed nannies. People who want performance will look to these older examples, built before 2022. New sales of interesting models could collapse as demand skyrockets for a selection of limiter-less cars that will only ever get smaller.
Since those models aren’t always all that common anyway, prices would rise. A lot, in some cases. Even left totally standard they’ll be worth much more. Then there’s the restomod scene: as Millennials get older and some of us get rich enough, we’ll look with lust at these interesting and unrestricted cars and will pay whatever it costs to bring one up to 2020s or 2030s spec, in the same way as luxury specialist David Brown Automotive brings the classic Mini into the 2010s.
The restomod scene is likely to grow over the next few decades as people cling to greater freedoms gone by, and with it the available supply of standard, older, interesting cars will dwindle even further. That will drive prices so high that those of us with normal jobs can’t even dream about ownership any more. You only have to look at MkIV Supra, Sierra Cosworth or E30 M3 prices to know how painfully likely this is.
The dawn of the mandatory speed limiter will have two effects: killing interest in powerful new cars and driving up prices of their predecessors. Will we still be able to enjoy them? You’d better plan to buy in the next couple of years, if you’re ever going to.
Comments
All I can say is for once I’m confident in the free market economy… this is the “nanny state” turned up to 11… what is next? Where to stop? Moreover, really, do they think people will just roll over and accept this? Historically people reeaaalllyy don’t like their governments controlling aspects of their lives. Then again, history is doomed to repeat itself… Viva la revaluation!
If you read the proposed legislation I think it says the speed limiters will be switchable/overridable by a firm press on the pedal? So whats the problem? If anything I don’t mind as it’ll help me not to speed when I don’t want to (e.g. any urban driving) without having to stare at the speedo
I had the same thought and the people who are the most annoyed by it are the 15 year olds who have never driven a car
lol
that’s how they get you !
whats the point of a speed limiter that can be turned off ?
to make it normal !
so that sometime down the line they can take away the switch and no one will say anything or even know that there is no switch !
one of the oldest tricks in the books !
Car makers want something of the sort. The EU doesn’t.
Even if it is not overridable, you could just put a piece of tape or a sticker over the camera and it won’t be able to read the speed limit.
That’s exactly what they want you to think
I don’t think new powerful cars would be affected as much as you think. For one acceleration is addictive and even if you are going to hit an electronic wall at 60 you are still getting there faster than a 100hp ecobox. For two it might shift focus away from horsepower wars and into handling. After all if you have to stick to the limit on that nice country road at least you will enjoy the corners. What it might actually do is actually increase availability of track days, since you would have to go to one to really open ‘er up. This might also have a side effect of decreasing costs as tracks would have to compete for more boy racer crowd.
This is not to mention that we already have plenty of tuners that will turn off speed governors, so if the system becomes mandatory, at this point it can be disabled by the driver at will, there will be reflashes or piggy backs or combination to defeat those.
The concern I have is that, even in good ol’ US of A where such legislation has a very slim chance of ever becoming a reality*, insurance companies might jack up prices on cars that are not equipped with those nannies (or at minimum offer discounts on those that are). Effectively making those systems mandatory simply due to people not being able to afford something that is cheap and fun.
*Not for any “muh freedom” reasons or anything lofty like that, many smaller municipalities use speeding tickets as supplemental income.
I’m happy I don’t live in the EU
One of the fews times ive been proud to be an American!
Damn the EU is just crapping on Europeans over and over again
if you werent brexit then, you might as well be now.
People driving Dacia sanderos speed. It’s not just performance cars
I’m moving to Russia
Fu*k the EU
F*ck the EU