This Is The Massively Fast New BMW M5
BMW has finally dropped the curtain and given us a full, untainted view of the fairly magnificent new M5, in all its twin-turbo V8 glory.
The new flagship super-saloon, which you might remember has been given switchable four-wheel drive, uses a development of the old M5’s engine, with new, larger turbos, indirect charge air cooling and increased fuel injection pressure. Power is now a faintly silly 592bhp at 5600-6700rpm, and torque has been inflated to a rather merry 553lb ft all the way from 1800-5600rpm.
So, it’s not exactly tardy when it comes to performance. We’re talking 0-62mph in 3.4 seconds, 0-124mph in 11.1 seconds; just 1.5 seconds slower than the 599bhp Porsche 911 Turbo S Exclusive Edition. The 0-62mph sprint here is exactly as quick as that of the Mercedes-AMG E63. Brace for about a million YouTube drag races. Top speed is either 155mph or the optional 189mph, depending on which limiter takes your fancy.
The four-wheel drive system can reduce its demand on the front tyres in four stages, giving more and more rearward bias until it starts to go sideways as easily as the average crab. Choosing one of the M xDrive modes lets you drift without overcooking it or looking the fool when leaving car meets.
Naturally it’s auto-only with paddle-fired sequential semi-manual shifts if you prefer. The driving modes span Comfort, Sport and Sport Plus, tweaking the M-tuned variable suspension and the steering weight. The driver can also set a pair of memorised settings combinations that suit them, which is nice. A ‘mother in law’ mode and a ‘Sunday sprint’ option, maybe…?
It’s a good looker, anyway. The bonnet bulge and the flared, muscular arches blend with up to 20-inch wheels, light-alloy wheels and standard carbon-ceramic brakes. The latter shaves a hefty 23kg off the old setup’s unsprung weight. We can’t wait to see it in action.
Comments
Kinda strange, I don’t see any turn signal stalks anywhere
you can see it on the interior pic and the joke is already milked, boo.
Boring, unoriginal joke
That joke is probably older that your mum
SaadAnwaar(#nissangtrisapc)
YUSSSSS
It looks like some kind of Ironed down F10, I don’t really like it. The specs on the other hand look very interesting!
-5 votes huh lol
I agree with you entirely. It looks quite boring to be honest
You got downvoted because of an opinion… What even
TheMindGarage where did your comment go? where did mine go? lol
I love it
Hey this is the first time in my life that I like the current gen M5, E63S and the RS6.
Not a huge fan of the RS6, but all three are amazing.
Buddy, sorry, but do u usually comment every single post? :D
Will I be wrong if I said this is the first time there is an E63S?
SaadAnwaar(#nissangtrisapc)
Clarkson sunday sprint as always been Cs+s+: Comfort (or other steering modes are bad) sport+ (to shred tyres faster) and sport + (to be closer to the road who will gladly receive your tyres shreded parts)
so either this new one is less powerful than the f10 or bmw have got it’s official hp wrong again
just imagine another m5 with an extra 50 horses hidden away like before
The F10 had 552hp.
And BMW always claim lower
Until they make it a V10, I’m not impressed anymore.
Yeah, so we got another force-induction engine smaller and sounding worse than one of its’ predecessors did (E60), going faster than the previous one because bigger turbos. Aren’t you bored? Even if I had the money I wouldn’t buy most new sports cars nowadays. You can say I’m a purist and I really am in this regard but when power builds up with increasing revolutions, and it’s accompanied by the sound of a bigger NA engine, that’s when I smile the brightest.
And I really don’t understand why that is impossible with these models. These are high-performance cars manufacturers make to show what they’re capable of. There are enough small efficient diesel and downsized mainstream petrol engines available, why make even the fastest and most powerful versions smaller and sounding worse? I really admire Lexus. They don’t care about being a bit slower than the competition, they keep it NA and they keep it sounding glorious with the LC500. Will most M5 owners actually make use of the 0-62 time? No. They will be using these in cities and highways, and when someone owns an M5, they don’t care about fuel economy.
The current M5 (F10) sounds pretty good (definitely better than the RS6), but of course nothing beats the E60 for me.
Yes, its sad when manufacturers take outright straight line speed over pure driving fun, which is why cars like the ND mx5 and elise are probably the last of their kind.
What triggers me the most is that there seems to be a bandwagon of hate against turbo’d sports cars. The same people also love and revere the Ferrari f40 and Porsche 959 which frankly amazes me
Most importantly, it was revealed along with Need for Speed Payback!