Most Performance Car Buyers Go For The Fastest Version Possible
It’s a pretty common trend for fast cars these days: you get the entry-level version, and one that’s a bit faster. The top-of-the-line model will have more power, perhaps a few more options plus a chassis change or two. And whether it’s called an S, a Plus or something else, we were curious to know: just how many people go for the fastest possible option?
To find out, we got in touch with a few manufacturers, and from what we’ve found, most UK buyers opt for the shoutiest version available. The first example is the Audi R8, where buyers are presented with two choices: the 531bhp V10, or the 602bhp V10 Plus. Audi told us that a whopping 80 per cent of buyers thus far have gone for the Plus, which does make sense: for the £18,000 premium you get a lot more power, and so much extra kit that if you specced it all on the standard V10, it’d end up being more expensive than the Plus.
So, what’s the point in the standard one, then? An Audi spokesperson told us that: “there are Audi customers who also want the supercar experience delivered in a slightly more understated form. This is evident when you compare traditional entry-level R8 sales, which in the majority of cases include features such as comfort seats and darker or more understated colour combinations.” The fact that just the Plus was available initially has skewed the figures, but we’d expect the Plus to remain the most popular version.
While Mercedes was unable to give us exact figures, it hinted that the split for the AMG-GT and AMG C63 models were weighted heavily towards the more power S models of each, while rivals BMW are predicting that 70 per cent of all M3 and M4s will be ordered with the new £3000 Competition Pack. This echoes the company’s experiences with the E9x M3, most of which were sold with its version of the pack after it was introduced.
If you go further down the food chain, it’s the same story. Seat originally offered 265 and 280 versions of its Leon Cupra in the UK, with the former - less powerful - car coming without the sensational VAQ differential. However, Seat UK dropped the 265 from the range due to poor sales - recently a spokesperson from the company told us that “less than five per cent” of buyers opted for the ‘lesser’ car.
Its rival from the Peugeot stable - the 308 GTI - enjoys a less extreme split between the 270 and the 250 editions of the car (the 270 comes with bigger brakes and wheels, an LSD and posher seats). But the more powerful 270 still takes a substantial 70 per cent of sales.
As with Audi, Peugeot’s rhetoric on the subject of the faster models dominating sales again focuses on defending the less powerful version. Some buyers might want something extreme, is the reasoning. However, when it comes to most of us rowdy performance car buyers in the UK, it seems that if we’re going to do it, we’re going to do it properly and get whatever version shouts loudest.
Where do you stand? Would you get the ‘lesser’ version of any of the cars we mentioned?
Comments
Very intriguing.
In my opinion, there is no reason to buy the lesser version of a car, even if you save a couple bucks. That’s why I bought the 1.8l Miata NA instead of a 1.6l.
I’d go for the faster one given that the price bump is justified and it’s not lacking equipment that I feel important like a good interior. Wanna be happy and comfortable with what I buy. Don’t like cloth seats and no extras just for the fastest especially for a new car.
Over half of those buttons are empty. Haha 😂
Surprised to see you missed out the entire Porsche range. Cayman/Cayman S, 911 Carrera/Carrera S , 911 Turbo/Turbo S, Targa 4/Targa 4S… The list goes on.
All differ by a bit of extra power which doesn’t make a massive difference, larger price tag and more standard options which are all available on the standard car anyway, and often when specced with the same options it’s still cheaper.
Moral of the story- the base car is always better value for money.
In 2012 Evo magazine featured the standard 911 991 Carrera instead of the Carrera S in their car of the year issue because the added power, price and fancy chassis options didn’t make much sense over the standard car, with less power and options in their opinion making it more enjoyable to drive.
At the end of the day, though, we are a nation of big savers, not spenders. If we can’t quite afford the top spec of anything, we normally just wait until we can. And ‘S’ has become a common acronym for ‘better’
Id go for the higher performance option availible, generally because if youre going to buy a car, its going to cost alot, so you may as well purchase the most expensive version. Mainly because buying a car usually doesnt occur every year- more like every several years.
And then it comes to mind that(especially mercedes) makes these S models only with a little bit more boost from the Turbos…honestly, buy the normal version, equip it the way you really want it to be and then after a while you can go to a tuner and do a remap and be faster than the “S” model without the hefty premium
A Garret turbo doesn’t cost that much and add a lot of power - just add a turbo
Not available for all cars mate
And a lot of buyers prefer N/A engines
Not to mention the voiding of OEM warranty
I’d go for a base one,then tune it to my taste. I think it will result somewhere between the gap so that would be nice :D
It depends.. I wouldnt pay a crazy amount of money for maybe 10hp more.. What I wouldnt buy are those Sport packages which dont make the car faster at all (S Line etc. or however they call it)