The Next Swift Sport Will Have A Better Power-To-Weight Ratio Than A GT86

The next Swift Sport will have more power-to-weight than a whole host of older, more powerful hot hatchbacks and even some brand new sports cars, and you can direct your thanks to massive weight reduction
The Next Swift Sport Will Have A Better Power-To-Weight Ratio Than A GT86

This is not a typo: the next Suzuki Swift Sport will have a higher power-to-weight ratio than the Toyota GT86. No, really.

Those who’ve driven the current one will know how good the Swift Sport already is. It’s an almost living, breathing embodiment of what a hot hatchback was designed to be; hilariously good to drive, quicker than you’d think and pretty damn affordable. It has character. It’s a car you can’t help but name, even if you don’t normally do that sort of thing.

It's our last year with this little gem
It's our last year with this little gem

It’s a wonderful car. It’s so light on its toes, able to absolutely storm along twisting roads and deftly flick left-right-left through roundabouts at speeds the police probably (definitely) wouldn’t approve of. Its suspension is pure perfection, giving you a level of control and confidence you just don’t find anywhere else below £25,000, and the fizzy little 1.6 under the bonnet loves to rev even more than you love to rev it. It’s brilliant. It’s not a matter of if I ever buy one; it’s a matter of when.

Part of its genius is its low weight. It may only have a year left to live as a current model, but it’s still even lighter than the famously light 2.0-litre MX-5. In fact, at 1045kg, the kerb weight is lower than just about any other similarly brisk hot hatch or sports car you could name. But the new one will be even lighter. A lot lighter, actually, and this is where things get really interesting.

Here's what the common-or-garden new Swift looks like
Here's what the common-or-garden new Swift looks like

A Suzuki insider told me earlier this week that the next Swift Sport, which we sadly don’t have any pictures of, yet, could weigh as little as 870kg. That’s basically one slim passenger’s worth lighter than a Volkswagen Up. We already know that it’s going to use the meaty 138bhp turbocharged 1.4 from the Vitara S, and putting the two figures together throws up some eye-opening numbers. The Vitara S, which is about the same weight as the current Swift, doesn’t exactly hang about.

The new car, if it does weigh so little, will deliver a power-to-weight ratio of 159bhp per ton. Without a basis for comparison you could brush that number aside, but the GT86 only has 158bhp/ton. When you factor in torque as well, the Toyota’s peak of 121lb ft per ton plays the Swift’s expected 186lb ft per ton. Don’t forget the Swift’s torque curve will be flatter and fatter, too. Yup, the 138bhp Swift should easily be faster than the 197bhp GT86 in everyday use.

The 1.4-litre BoosterJet engine destined for the Swift Sport
The 1.4-litre BoosterJet engine destined for the Swift Sport

Don’t get me wrong. I love the GT86 like it’s my first-born, but you’ve got to admit the Swift’s numbers are pretty awesome. It’s going to be genuinely quick, and it’s going to achieve it without posting big power figures that scare insurance companies.

Weight reduction is the key (bro). Losing flab also means nimbler handling, less wear on tyres and brakes, and less stress on the suspension. The same virtuous circle brings reduced fuel consumption, and given that it’s already possible in the current Swift Sport to hit the 50s for miles per gallon on a long, steady run, is 60mpg going to be possible in the next one? Maybe. There are no drawbacks in this equation, except for losing the super-crisp throttle response of the outgoing normally aspirated 1.6.

The Next Swift Sport Will Have A Better Power-To-Weight Ratio Than A GT86

That’s why, for me, weight reduction kicks power increases square in the gooseberries. Extra power brings higher performance at higher speeds, but lower weight brings so much more. It’s always the first improvement any car maker should make to any car that’s designed to involve the driver even in the slightest. The next Swift Sport is going to be mega. If, when I drive it, it’s even better than the one you can buy today, I may have to make an excitement-related underwear change.

Sponsored Posts

Comments

Anonymous

Oh here comes the “faster than the GT86” memes

04/01/2017 - 09:06 |
66 | 2
Ali Mahfooz

This is not a typo

I hope it’s not April Fools either.

04/01/2017 - 09:12 |
102 | 2
Anonymous

At this point I feel like most of the things that I have discovered in CT is faster than a GT86.

04/01/2017 - 09:12 |
342 | 0
Noah Thorley Images

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

Savage

04/01/2017 - 09:15 |
46 | 2
Joshua Persaud (Wagon/Estate Squad) (Sleeper Squad) I need a

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

I wonder if Phil or Collins are faster then a GT86.
Help me Alex Kersten.

04/01/2017 - 16:38 |
28 | 2
Anonymous

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

And has a front end better than the 86

04/01/2017 - 17:30 |
18 | 4
Anonymous

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

So many cars are supposedly faster than the 86/BRZ

WHY CANNOT ONE OF THEM ALSO BE REAR WHEEL DRIVE FFS ??
Really, why can’t we get something that goes fast AND does donuts/drifts? :D

04/02/2017 - 10:58 |
4 | 0
Anonymous

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

Is Car Throttle faster than a GT86

04/02/2017 - 12:45 |
10 | 0
Deoxide

And yes, it aint an April Fools too.

  • CarThrottle rn.
04/01/2017 - 09:24 |
30 | 0
Freewie

TurboToddler (Straight-five) yeah offcourse a ff with more power does have a better power to weight……… …..but I’m not sure if it is as much fun to drive as the GT86

04/01/2017 - 09:27 |
2 | 2
Anonymous

Kinda unrelated, but would a previous generation Suzuki Swift make a good first car for an 18 year old (ie. Myself) living in the UK who has recently passed his driving test?

04/01/2017 - 09:27 |
10 | 0
Joe A-O

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

Its a great car but insurance might be prohibitive without a blackbox, and having a blackbox defeats the point of having the car

04/01/2017 - 09:47 |
2 | 0
Anonymous

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

I’d certainly say it makes a wonderful first car (the 1.2 petrol, at least… insurance probs ain’t gonna be cheap for anything hotter). Are you talking about the 2010 onwards model? I’ve got a 2012 1.2 petrol as my first (and current) car. Only have positive things to say about it (except the bootspace… its got no boot for a car with such a fat arse). The 1.2’s insurance is on the lower end of the spectrum if I remember correctly.

04/01/2017 - 14:27 |
6 | 0
Anonymous

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

Yeh go for it! My first car is a 2008 swift sport 1.6 and it’s great fun

04/02/2017 - 16:17 |
0 | 0
88Akhil

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

I am currently driving a 2006 Swift 1.3 Zxi. Recently crossed 200,000 km. It is a fun car with decent handling and comfort. One of the best cars to learn/practice basic driving skills along with having fun. Yesterday only I stretched its legs to 170 kmph (on the speedo). Not bad for a 10+ year old car.

04/03/2017 - 10:05 |
2 | 0
Anonymous

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

My first car was or still is 2008 swift sport. Brilliant car love it to bits.

04/05/2017 - 16:06 |
0 | 0
Tomislav Celić

Toyota 86 was never about power ffs

04/01/2017 - 09:34 |
6 | 6

Yes, but doesn’t this have even less power? The focus here is more on the car’s weight than the amount of power it makes.

04/01/2017 - 09:41 |
4 | 0

There’s a different between “not about power” and “really bad power”. The engine in the GT86 is pretty breathless. The giant torque valley at mid and low revs makes it agonising to drive unless you wring its neck.

04/12/2017 - 19:16 |
0 | 0
Caro

Suzuki is stepping up their already quite high game.

04/01/2017 - 09:40 |
6 | 0
Ahmad Fahrurrozi

Hmm…

04/01/2017 - 09:43 |
2 | 12
KENMERI

So,the Swift Sport is an alternative for those who can’t affords the 86?Nice….oh wait,Suzuki no longer sell their cars in here :/

04/01/2017 - 09:44 |
10 | 4

Malaysia?
*cries

04/01/2017 - 10:17 |
2 | 0