Saab Is Planning A Comeback But Not In The Way We Hoped
When everyone’s favourite Swedish automaker filed for bankruptcy at the tail end of 2011, the automotive community went into collective mourning. You name it, every automotive publication, website and TV show dedicated time to the passing of Saab. To non car enthusiasts, this might have come as a surprise. I mean, Saab produced some solid vehicles, but surely you could hardly call them special? But to say that would be missing the point entirely.
The left-field choice
Saab produced some of the most quirky and innovative cars on the market. The company’s eclectic mix of vehicles were a nice antidote to the usual choice of Mercedes, BMW and Audi. Small touches like placing the key between the seats, or having a button to dim the internal lights at night (Night Panel) added to the experience. Granted, at times, Saab overplayed its tenuous connection with the aerospace industry, but we loved them for it.
So with the announcement that Saab could be returning in 2017, you’d probably think that we’re super excited to see the Swedish brand make a come-back. Unfortunately, that’s not the case. Here’s why…
Destined for failure
After filing for bankruptcy in 2011, it finally looks like the Swedish automaker might be able to make a comeback. Mattias Bergman, the chairman of National Electric Vehicle Sweden (NEVS, the company that acquired Saab’s assets back in 2012) made an announcement last week at the automotive conference Stora Bildagen, that the company is planning to launch four new vehicles in 2017, along with an electric 9-3.
The first of the three new vehicles is going to be a sedan with a fast back roof, much in the style of the Audi A7 and Mercedes CLS - sounds good to us. But more surprisingly, three out of the four vehicles will be ‘Active All-Rounder’ SUVs. So what does Active All-Rounder actually mean you might ask? Well, it means that each SUV will serve a different purpose; Distinctive Family, Urban Adventurer and Sporty Urban to be precise. But when you cut through all the marketing hype and waffle, in essence, these cars are basically going to be glorified crossovers.
Unfortunately, even on first assessment, Bergman’s plan looks destined for failure. In fact the whole thing reminds us very much of Dany Bahar’s overambitious five-model recovery plan for Lotus, which left the company in serious financial difficulties back in 2012. For a company like Saab, that has only just been bailed out of bankruptcy, producing four completely new vehicles alongside a new EV doesn’t sound like a solid business plan.
NEVS may not even be able to use the Saab name
Saab AB, the iconic Swedish aerospace firm who helped to found the automobile company, owns the rights to the Saab name. Originally NEVS was given permission to use the name when it acquired Saab’s assets back in 2012. But unfortunately, things have changed since then. When NEVS ran into financial difficulty in 2014, it had to apply to the Swedish Courts for creditor protection. On application for this protection, Saab AB decided to cancel its brand agreement with NEVS and left the company without the right to use the iconic name.
NEVS has been working hard to find financial backing from automakers, and a recent deal with Dongfeng Motor has given them some hope, but with $57 million owed to creditors, the firm is not out of trouble yet. And because the financial worries are ongoing, it looks unlikely that Saab AB will be giving them the rights to use the name anytime soon.
The Old Days
The Saab name carries with it strong brand recognition. When we think of the Swedish automaker we think of models like the 900 Turbo, the 99 Turbo and even the mad 9-3 Viggen. Cars that weren’t necessarily the best in class, but vehicles that were unique, quirky and brilliant fun. And when these machines died out, the company quickly foundered.
I mean, let’s face it, who wants to buy a Chevrolet TrailBlazer in drag? Even the kinda cool Saabaru, the 9-2X Aero, didn’t have a market. So why does Mattias Bergman think that it’s a good idea to follow a similar pattern to General Motors? For the sake of the Saab’s heritage, we hope that in these circumstances, the company doesn’t make a return.
Comments
Let it rest
for your pleasure
My current and first car is an ‘07 9-5 Aero SportCombi and I love every single moment of it. Out of every single car that I’ve been in, I feel like Saab just has a certain character to it that no other car manufacturer can figure out. Not to mention that it absolutely destroys every ricer Honda on the street. Sad to realize the ugly truth about Saab’s future.
(つ ° ʖ °)つ
I own a Saab 9-7x 5.3i (trailblazer in disguise) I don’t know about buying one brand new, but to own a used one has been fantastic. Got the dependability and parts base from gm, with the look and neat features of a Saab. They depriciated drastically but it is highly underrated. It identical to a Trailblazer SS and has ever option offered except has the 5.3l, and is cheaper used then a base trailblazer.
The 9-7x aero would be comparable to the ss with the same LS2 v8
Mines the Chili Red Metallic 2005 9-5 aero sedan. Manual transmission , stage 3 tune with some other goodies. Love this car and most saabs!
I own a c900, and everytime I hop into it after driving or riding in another brand it just feels like coming home. Everything’s simple, in the right place, the greenhouse is EPIC, it’s easy to drive (except for the manual choke), I just love it.
I can understand NEVS for going for a couple of crossover type cars, it’s really the only way to get some traction in the marketplace these days. They need to actually sell cars to be able to build cool stuff for the enthousiast. I’m really curious to see how it’ll pan out for NEVS. Frankly it all looked pretty outdated and empty when I was at the factories in Trollhättan past July..
If Saab wants to make a comeback, it should focus on the distinguishing design language and mindset that made a Saab a Saab. Rebadging some cars isn’t the solution obviously, just stick to your own roots as a car manufacturer… If you can mix innovation with these things, it’d be possible.
We need a car called felix :)