There's Potentially A Big Problem In Europe For The Stunning Kia Stinger
All eyes were on the Kia stand at the Detroit motor show this week, for a while at least, where the Stinger GT was finally unveiled.
To say it’s a departure from Kia’s normal wares is an understatement. It’s about as close in spirit to the Picanto and Cee’d as a Eurofighter is to a Cessna. That makes it a risk, especially for a brand whose only prior experience of building a performance car is a 201bhp platform used by three and five-door warm hatchbacks.
This lack of provenance is more of a problem than true petrolhead morality says it should be. After all, we want to love any car that deserves it, not just those that have the right badges. If and when we get a go in the 360bhp Stinger we’ll let you know what we think. But there are facets of the car’s reality that count against it, increasing the risk of launching it at all.
For one thing it’s built on the same platform as the Hyundai Genesis, which isn’t exactly a sporting beast. The suspension and rear axle have been completely revised and/or redesigned, says Kia, and the exhaust for the 3.3-litre turbocharged V6 is bespoke to this car. Early reports from pre-production cars say the noise it makes is a bit dull, though, and apparently the chassis is – or was at the time – a bit roly-poly.
Then there’s the fact that the Stinger is being launched at a very crowded price point. Mercedes, BMW, Audi and Jaguar all have forced-induction rivals for around the £43,000 the Kia will cost, and history tells us that when there’s a choice between a stunning and different option and one (or many) with the right badge for the same price, people are shallow and go for the badge.
The only guess we can make, between the early driving feedback and Kia’s own assertion that this isn’t an outright sports car as much as it’s a (more) luxurious (than its other cars) long-distance grand tourer, is that the fear of taking too big a risk has lead to the company running the biggest risk of all: being ignored.
Take the Toyota Corolla T-Sport as an example. It had a screaming engine that rivalled the one in the Civic Type R of the day, was more comfortable and at least as well built. But it was overlooked because it offered less of what the market ultimately wanted. Fast, high-power saloon versions of mainstream cars like the Mondeo and Laguna (remember that?) ultimately failed. The Vauxhall Cascada flopped because it’s not a premium product. The Stinger will offer comfort and a strong engine, but it needs more than that to win this fight.
When we look at sports cars that have attempted to disrupt the market, only two things have ever worked: exceptional price and/or performance. Take the Jaguar E-Type, which was faster than Ferraris and cost vastly less to buy. The fact that it looked a million dollars was a bonus. Genius: a legend was born.
When The Nissan GT-R was launched, it offered space-time-bending speed and traction for not much more than half the price of a 911 Turbo, so the fact that it was a Nissan didn’t matter. It was an instant cult hit, albeit one with the benefit of three Skyline-badged predecessors to add the all-important sense of heritage.
Launching a grand tourer into a marketplace already dominated by proven (and celebrated) Germans, with comparable power and price, is going to be tricky. With the best will in the world, on this continent the odds are stacked against the Kia.
But with the USA as the car’s real target, perhaps its main function in Europe will be as a figurehead; a halo product that makes the brand look even more appealing to people searching for a stylish daily driver. The UK sales figures will eventually give us a guide, but don’t expect to see too many.
Comments
Those facts Sting the heart of Kia fans
Kia fans?? I’m not sure that’s a thing haha…….. yet 😉
In all seriousness, IMO it would be a really good move by Kia if they separate the “Stinger” brand from Kia’s, just like the Genesis!! And I can see a coupe and -hopefully- an estate on the way!! And the separation can lead to a powerful marque to rival other brands head to head!!!
That is if it succeeds…
Look how well it worked for ds and psa
Even if the sales figures are not stunning and the car isn’t that great, it is still a start.
Firstly, there is the valuable experience that they gained by making this car which will help if they make other performance cars in the future. Next time, we won’t be able to say that Kia never made fast cars before.
Secondly, there is this brand thing. BMW and Audi didn’t have such strong reputation after they made their first car either. So for now, Kia is obviously disadvantaged but in a few years time, after they made a few more attempts and learned from their mistakes, this might not be so obvious. Hopefully, they will have established their brand in petrolheads’ minds.
So for me, whatever this car turn outs to be, Kia earned my respect. They have the courage to invest into something exiting and yet risky from a financial point of view. As I said before, even some Japanese manufacturers (e.g. Mitsu) don’t have the balls to do it and rather invest into something “safe” (SUVs) despite much more experience and heritage of making sportscars.
Well look how things are going at lexus and infinity, they never made money in europe in the last 10 years. as my h as I find it refreshing to see a company to take risk, the “premium tourer” segment is one which is chocablock from cars going from “mainstream” companies as Volkswagen to the big 3 Germans. we’ve seen with jaguar that being labeld as the anticonformiste product is not a great way to profit
Another problem is the bagde itself. Why would you buy a KIA if you can get a BMW, Audi or Mercedes at the same price.
Because BMW, Audi or Mercedes are way too common and they need to be challenged
Because BMW, Audi or Mercedes are way too common and they need to be challenged
I really doubt that you can convince people to buy a KIA instead of a BMW or Mercedes
They said that about Lexus in the early 90s and everyone traded BMWs and Cadillacs for a Lexus.
German luxury car owners are a tough crowd, maybe some other bigger brands have a chance of breaking the forcefield but definately not Koreans
I think theyre more aiming for
People who arent in the bmw/mercedes crowd who are turned away by high ownership costs. Maybe more of an infinitt and lincoln competitor than a bmw/mercedes ome.
True. But infinty and lexus kinda have the same problem. They are great car no denying that but in the end they are “just” expensive Nissans and Toyotas.
Why not support more diversity on the road?
Oh i live in france an appart uber nobody really uses them
It’s for real a STINGY problem
Let the sales do the talking. Kia has a very good (if not prestigious) brand reputation in the UK. Plus it’s aimed as being more of a relaxed, but still spirited, driving experience, rather than the knife edge 3-series and XE