What Are Variable Displacement Engines?
You’d think if one owned a V8 Bentley or Audi, fuel economy wouldn’t exactly be a priority. Having something like a Continental GT should mean that you’re cool with nothing much over 10mpg and stupendously expensive road tax. And yet a new wave of variable displacement engines has come to fruition, making gas-guzzling machines a more convenient proposition for those who wish to blend raw power with polar bear-sparing efficiency.
These engines work by deactivating half of the cylinders, leaving them dormant in slow driving, low-load situations like when crawling around a city centre. Like stop-start technology, the full engine will roar back into life once a certain throttle position is reached.
When driving slowly with little to no throttle, the pressure within a cylinder is decreased compared to when under heavy load. This incurs a pumping loss as the engine has to waste energy drawing air into the cylinders to keep it running, thereby decreasing its efficiency. The energy losses at low speeds from larger engines mean that for day-to-day driving, a city car with a small three or four-cylinder engine will have a much higher internal cylinder pressure, making them much more efficient.
A deactivation of cylinders will therefore lead to the air entering from the intake manifold being distributed to less cylinders, increasing the engine’s efficiency. This is specifically done by shutting the intake and exhaust valves of any given cylinder simultaneously, leaving the deactivated cylinder isolated from the engine’s usual functions.
Exhaust gases from the previous stroke are trapped in the cylinder once it is deactivated and are compressed and then decompressed as the piston continues its stroke. This rise and fall in pressure however is virtually equal meaning that no extra load is applied to the engine during deactivation.
An ECU can be programmed to cut the fuel supplied to a cylinder for the deactivation and the ignition timing modified to make the transition between the full engine and the smaller displacement smooth and safe for the powertrain. It is because of this simple electronic control that many companies have pursued variable displacement in light of the constant war on emissions.
The technology was pioneered by Cadillac (a surprisingly innovative company back in the day) and Alfa Romeo, with Cadillac pushing the boat out with a V8-6-4 engine. Alfa went for a simpler 4-cylinder that deactivated down to just two for town driving and were successful in their design but the technology was discontinued after 1983. The M152 engine from the CL63 AMG is a great example of a V8-4 variable displacement engine, along with Bentley’s W12 engine from the Continental GT which simplifies down to just six cylinders.
Honda patented a different angle of variable displacement by trying to control the stroke of the piston rather than a complete cylinder shut down. An innovative crankshaft design means that the cylinder capacity can be changed around at will, giving much more flexibility in comparison to a standard variable system. They have now gone one step further and designed an engine that has completely different stroke lengths for every cylinder, while keeping the cylinder bore identical in each. Despite the patents for these designs, Honda has yet to fully implement these systems in their road cars but they may start with their motorbike engines as guinea pigs for something more spectacular.
By reducing pumping losses and the amount of fuel entering the engine, even a burbling V8 can achieve some form of respectable efficiency. If hybridisation isn’t for you and the term ‘eco’ has no significance in your life, this technology may be for you. In a world full of downsizing and turbocharging, variable displacement still gives hope to those who see low full consumption as characterful rather than a scourge. Because, really, there’s still no replacement for displacement.
Comments
I have a V6 ‘09 Honda Accord with cylinder management and I absolutely hate it. I will pay anyone who can provide a replacement computer system that will maintain all the systems but that horrific cylinder shut down. It is not a transparent system. You feel it working constantly, and the transmission has to shift way too often as load and acceleration requirements change. Mileage is not improved very much either. My V6 Genesis Coupe with a 6 speed manual will easily get better mileage and provide better power on demand and both cars weigh in around 3800 lbs. What they aren’t telling you is that a cylinder that has been shut down is allowing oil up past the upper rings if run for any length in that mode, fouling the plug and layering an oil film which become carbon deposits once combustion is resumed, without the combustion pressure to keep it down where the oil ring can scrape it away. This only gets worse with age and wear. And with oil grades at 5w-20 or even lighter which are required by the variable valve timing mechanisms and high flow rate oiling systems it’s difficult to manage. Honda had originally had the system shut down cylinders in a preset pattern to maintain the smoothest operation, but it caused those cylinders to foul very quickly so they modified the program to make it a more random selection of which cylinders to shut down. At times this is a truly unpleasant combination, which requires the driver to accelerate for a few seconds and hope a different set of cylinders comes up in the program. I’ll pass on any cylinder management in favor of high compression , direct injection designs with transmission ratios able to keep cruising speeds in the 1500-1800 rpm range. Great fuel economy. Need more speed and power, drop a few gears and wind her up.
it doesn’t mean it’s not a good technology it’s just that honda sucked at it, audi made years before (early 2000s, search for the audi A8 V8 TDI) and it was brilliant.
Mercedes had this on the s class 15 years ago
Brilliant! Lower eco-taxes, lower fuel consumption and you still got the power for whenever you need it. Dear performance car makers, put this technology in all of your cars!
http://www.gomecsys.com/
What about the Saab Variable Compression (SVC) engine?
Some outboard boat engines have implemented this technology quite a few years ago to meet rising environmental concerns towards them. Sorry to burst your bubble :P
Nah, I like electric more. Why go to all this complication when I can have instant torque, higher efficiency and a lower CG than a gas car along with higher reliability due to a major reduction in moving parts?
They say because it is more exciting. I don’t have a license yet so I can’t really tell how it really is compared but of course the sound is a quadrillion times better. Anyways I’ll wait until I can experience it myself.
Chrysler has been using this for almost 15 years in their HEMI engines.
They haven’t been making hemis for 15 years.
10 years, friend. And it still works flawlessly
Thanks to cylinder deactivation, I can now get up to 18 mpg in my hemi :P
My grandmothers gets 20 right now, its a 5.7, my father’s 5.7 gets 11 if hes lucky lol.
Would honda’s be called Dtech? (Variable displacement technology)