Will All Cars Be Electric By 2025?
A Stanford economist has made some predictions that will send cold shivers up the spines of petrolheads around the world. If his bold prophecies about the North American car market are correct, then 95% of people in the U.S. won’t own a car; no petroleum-fueled vehicles will be on the road; and the global oil industry will be eviscerated.
And all of this will happen before 2030.
These are not the ramblings of of a doomsday prepper or a science-fiction author. These bold claims are being made by Tony Seba, an internationally-renowned economist and futurist from Stanford University. Mr. Seba is the leader of a project called RethinkX; which consists of a panel of international academics studying the market dynamics of the transportation sector. The 77-page RethinkX report predicts that the transportation industry as we know it will disappear within a few short years.
The report contains a lot of maths and goes into great detail about the widespread economic implications of electric vehicle ownership. It’s a long and thorough report that takes quite a bit of time to read, but the basics behind it are actually fairly simple and intuitive. The most important aspect of the report is centred around the concept of transport as a service (TaaS). Basically, TaaS refers to services that provide transport for individuals (e.g. public transit, taxis, Uber/Lyft, etc.)
Seba predicts that the cost of utilizing TaaS will fall to the point where it no longer makes economic sense to own a vehicle. Autonomous vehicles will play a critical role in this cost shift as it will eliminate the costs of hiring drivers, as well as provide people with the ability to be more productive in their commute. This surge in the value of TaaS will result in a collapse in the value of the private automobile, as it will cost more to buy and maintain a vehicle than it would to hire a car for transportation.
The ripple effects don’t stop there. RethinkX also predicts that the marginal costs of producing and running EVs will also fall such that petroleum-powered vehicles become economically unattractive. Once this happens, the demand for petroleum products in the transportation industry will all but disappear.
This sounds like devastating news for petrolheads, but the implications could be even worse for the economies of many regions of the world. For example, the Canadian province of Alberta relies heavily on its oil industry to sustain its economy. A collapse in the oil market would almost certainly devastate the large cities of Edmonton and Calgary (pictured); and could possibly disrupt the national economies of both Canada and the United States. These predictions seem to make common sense. The shock value of the RethinkX report comes from the time scale—it proposes that these changes will take place around 20 years sooner than previously thought.
Of course, these consequences beg the question of how accurate the RethinkX prophecy is. If the advancement of technology is as rapid as Tony Seba predicts, autonomous EVs and collective ride-sharing will theoretically optimal. I’m not quite as convinced, however, that the private automobile is going anywhere just yet.
There are a few reasons why I am skeptical of RethinkX. Owning a car has thus far been an immortal component of the American Dream, and I don’t see people being very willing to give up the emotional attachment to their own cars. People don’t make decisions purely based on economic efficiency. What’s more, there’s a certain amount of peace of mind associated simply with owning your own car. If your car has ever broken down and caused you to make alternative transportation arrangements, you’ll know exactly what I am talking about.
I am also skeptical of the report’s prediction that the industry will rapidly advance and squeeze the internal combustion engine out of the market. The corporations associated with the automotive industry are incredibly powerful, and I doubt very highly that they will go down without a fight. This is also true of the magnates of the oil industry, which include OPEC and the massive transnational corporations that produce and distribute petroleum products. The implications of international relationships with oil-producing nations would also be a massive challenge to overcome.
Finally, as mentioned above in one of my previous Ecarnomics blogs, one cannot ignore the impact of widespread EV usage on the electrical infrastructure. This concern is particularly obvious in developing nations in the global South, but cannot be ignored even in nations with the best power grids. It will probably never be known how such an increase in the demand for electricity will impact the electrical infrastructure; and the electricity market therein.
Despite the radical and potentially unrealistic view of the future that RethinkX gives us, I cannot dismiss the report outright. It could very well be right. The economics make an enticing case for a driverless future, no matter how absurd it seems to us petrolheads. Tony Seba’s report is incredibly important to understand, as it outlines the inevitable car culture of the future. Whether or not that future will arrive in 10 years or 40 years, however, remains to be seen.
An #ecarnomics post.
Comments
I highly doubt ALL cars will be electric by then
Don’t worry, we won’t allow it. I don’t care if gas powered cars are illegal, I’ll drive one anyways. There is no way they would be able to force everyone to drive electric.
Can stop a car that is faster then you
Can’t drive a car without fuel. As sad as it is, down the road they might completely make petrol illegal to citizens.
pfff…let me see you boiii
Aren’t all cars electric if they have a car battery?
😑
But electricity usually comes from nuclear power…
Not necessarily. Depends on where in the world you live. Most electricity in my region comes from coal.
How did it get Editors Pick in only 6 minutes?
He’s CT staff so idk.
I think that gasoline cars will still be there this is what might happen in 2030
40% gasoline
60% electric
Fairly accurate estimation I’ll say…
In western countries yes… But in countries when usually people drive 15 year old cars that is highly unlikely.
In cities? YES please…where do I sing for this?
You can sing for this in xfactor
A future with no petrol cars actually makes me terrified. Sure, it’ll be good for the enviroment, there’ll be less traffic cand all, but given the emotional attachment people have to their cars and how they can convey their owner personalities, the world will look more like a computer-ran dystopia where humans are less and less relevant.
Okay, I went too sci-fi for a minute. And this song is playing in my head right now…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j7qJ6cb3S8s
If you ask me, the future is hybrid.
Imo you’re completely wrong about it based on “we never miss what we’ve never had”.
If there was a generation where 95% were taught from an early age that electric is the norm and largely only experience EVs, they’d think that the future with no petrol cars is perfectly normal.
Your fear of the change is based on your past experiences and preconceptions, but that doesn’t necessarily translate to future people thinking that their present is bleak.
If that happens I’ll be the guy trying to swap a 900KVA transformer into his old electrically-converted truck to make it go faster..
You could still have a petrol car. I’ll still probably have my mustang by then, or some other wacky petrol vehicle.
The short answer: No.
The long answer: Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo.
Agreed I’d say at least 2050 at the very least, because look at how many petrol/diesel cars there is to the number of EV’s it’s not going to be for a long time.
I hate humanity… They can’t try and make sustainable and clean alternatives (like biofuel) for petroleum to keep the ICE alive and cleaner than ever, but instead push for EVs that use electricity that in most cases was generated by burning coal, which is worse for the environment than regular automotive fuel. There’s a reason why coal burning locomotives aren’t around anymore, and that is because burning coal is incredibly bad for the environment, yet humans are hypocrites and will happily use an electric train run by the same “fuel” that is so bad for the environment in the first place.
First of all coal burning isn’t around because it would be really inefficient in cars and it would make cars much bigger in order to accommodate the essentials. Also the idea behind going electric isn’t burning coal instead of gas. Electricity can be generated through wind and solar power as well as a few other methods which are developing alongside EVs. The goal in my mind is to help the environment by generating the required electricity from renewable energy sources.
Biofuel is alot less clean than you actually think. And even with the dirtiest coal powered electricity, evs are far ahead of ice.
Before you comment, try to know something, that way you won’t spread idiotic falsehoods.
“There’s a reason why coal burning locomotives aren’t around anymore, and that is because burning coal is incredibly bad for the environment, yet humans are hypocrites and will happily use an electric train run by the same “fuel” that is so bad for the environment in the first place.”
That is, without a doubt, one of the most idiotic things I have ever read on the internet. If God truly exist, may he have mercy on your soul.
Where the hell did you get your information from? A tabloid?
First of all, coal locomotives were out phased because they were extremely inefficient, both in terms of thermal efficiency and power to weight. Most modern locomotives are diesel-electric hybrids, which offer much better efficiency and power to weight.
Second, coal plants operate around 40-60% thermal efficiency. A 2017 Prius is maxed out at 40%. Regenerative and multi-step coal plants can achieve up to 90% due to waste heat being used for heating.
Third, clean coal technology exists. By that, coal plants have emissions restrictions, and there are technologies like air washing, large scale catalytic converters, and carbon capture that drastically reduce their emissions. An EV powered by a clean coal plant is cleaner than an high-efficiency gas burner.
Fourth, most industrialized countries have renewable energy sources accounting for a percent of their power generation. For many, it is around 5-10%. Not much, but that number is increasing steadily every year.
Fifth, eco fuels…aren’t very eco. You are still producing exhaust gases, some of which are not absorbed by the creatures that create the fuel. E85 has been proven to do more harm to the environment than good because the cultivation of land to create it has a larger negative environmental impact than the positive environmental impact it provides due to reduced emissions.