5 Reasons Superchargers Are Dying Out
Superchargers have been a staple of forced induction for decades, with the first supercharged cars strapping the compressors to the front of the engine before emigrating to sit either on top of the engine block or bolted to the engine’s flank. Despite the legendary whine of this induction method, superchargers are dying out with the dawn of downsizing and turbocharging.
It’s even looking like Jaguar might be leaving superchargers in the past, having once been stalwarts of the technology for the last couple of decades, and one of the few manufacturers still using them.
So why are they old hat?
1. Lack of efficiency
While turbochargers recycle exhaust gases and increase an engine’s efficiency, a supercharger is driven by a connection to a belt running from the crankshaft. This means that energy is being sapped from the engine’s natural rotation to power the supercharger. This is known as a parasitic loss.
The parasitic loss is also directly proportional to an increase in fuel consumption as the engine is working harder to produce the desired power, which these days is a massive black mark in any manufacturer’s book.
2. Dimensions
With the automotive power war in full swing, it is fairly easy for a manufacturer to ramp up the power from a turbocharged engine by turning up boost pressure or fiddling with the turbine’s internals. For a supercharger to keep up in the same fashion, the dimensions of the entire ‘charger would have to increase in conjunction with the amount of desired boost, blowing up to something inconveniently heavy and massive.
3. Reliability
A supercharger puts a huge amount of stress on an engine through kinetic energy and heat production, therefore many engine components have to be over-engineered to cope with the additional strains put upon them. In most cases, this then leads to added weight and diminishing returns in terms of performance.
4. High weight placement
The popular placement for a modern supercharger is above the bank of cylinders, with many V8 engines positioning it neatly above the engine’s V. Unfortunately, this means a large chunk of metal alloy is sitting very high in the engine bay, raising the overall centre of gravity of the car which could potentially disturb the car’s dynamics. An increase in height of the centre of gravity increases the rate of yaw and will lead to much more lateral lean during hard cornering; not something that’s ideal for performance car motoring.
5. Cost
The sheer amount of engineering that goes into supercharging a vehicle almost inevitably trickles down into the price tag. The additional reinforcing of standard components to meet the specifications for supercharging will inevitably lead to a higher price tag along with the need to use premium fuels in engines subjected to the stresses of forced induction of this manner.
I personally love the sound and feel of a supercharger and would take one over a turbocharger on my Mk2 MX-5 any day of the week. Thee linear power delivery and the visceral shriek they pump into the cabin is truly addictive. Cars like the Vauxhall VXR8 and the Jaguar XKR-S are supercharged legends, or you could go the full whack and combine supercharging with turbocharging like Lancia on the brutal Delta S4. If there was ever an argument for supercharging, this onboard footage is it.
I’ll be sad to see superchargers consigned to the history books. They’re not perfect, but cars wouldn’t be any fun if they were flawless, would they?
Comments
THE COMENTS ARE FULL OF SMOKE!!!
I can’t hear you over the sound of my freedom whine
‘MERICAAAAA
Aye aye captain
VICTORY CHREEEECH!!!!!!
Superchargers
Charging your money in a super speed and super satisfaction
In Turbo we trust..
Lol
Thrust*!
Boost Approved
Interesting though that the only current production motorcycle with forced induction is supercharged.
I guess that is because motorcycles still value performance and rideability over fuel economy
Probably since emissions are better on motorcycles to begin with, they have less regulations to worry about. Plus, a more linear, smooth power band is much safer on a bike. You don’t want a random spike in power under full throttle, can cause the front to lift. The H2 is a beast
actually, it’s because bikes need to be predictable, they need to feel naturally aspirated. If you’d have a turbocharger that suddenly spins up and delivers a big power increase while you’re leaned over in a turn, you’d lose real wheel grip and crash immediately. It would be like an old 911, only worse.
The H2 is technically twin charged. It has a gear driven turbine that provides constant boost in the low to mid rpm, and then as the impeller increases in speed a clutch activates allowing to spin freely, acting like a turbo.
If all the N/A people could stop whining…
huehuehue
They are just trying to fit in with the supercharged crowd
I’m not a big fan of muscle and supercharger stuff but I think its a pity to loose any chance of adding power.
[DELETED]
(Null)
The XE S has something to say about that
German Tuner G Power became famous with it putting two of those in am M5 E60 and it resulted in 820 PS.
What a pity that such times seem to be over in the near future. But hey, let’s not whine about it (pun intended).