6 Cars That Lied About Their Power Outputs
BMW M5 (F10)
While it was jolly exciting when the M5 broke the 600hp (592bhp) mark with the 30 Jahre version of the F10, it perhaps wasn’t as big a deal as it might have otherwise been. Why? Because the standard car was already hitting that figure. Lord knows how much the special edition was actually putting out.
Various dyno tests have put standard F10 M5s around the 600 mark, well in excess of the official figure of 552bhp. We still feel sad about the death of the V10 version, but that power is one hell of a way to make up for it.
Nissan Skyline GT-R (R34)
When looking at a lot of Japanese performance cars from the 1990s and early 2000s, a figure will come up quite frequently: 276bhp. Allegedly, it’s all part of a gentleman’s agreement that saw the major Japanese car manufacturers producing cars with bang on that figure on paper, but the reality is many were putting out over 300bhp.
In the case of the R34, the actual power output from its twin-turbo RB26 straight-six is more like 322.
Toyota Century
It wasn’t just performance cars that had some less than realistic power figures in the 1990s. The V12-powered Toyota Century officially made - you guessed it - 276bhp, when it actually developed over 300bhp. So this 5.0-litre lump was still producing a fairly modest, understressed output for such a big engine - just one that was slightly higher than advertised.
Porsche 959
One of the most exciting and technologically innovative supercars of the 1980s was the legendary Porsche 959. It had four-wheel drive, active suspension, and even active tyre monitoring.
With 450bhp developed from its turbocharged flat-six, it was no slouch either. However, rumour has it the cars left the factory with closer to 500. There isn’t quite as much solid info on the veracity of the claims compared to other cars here, but it’s a rumour that persists.
Ford Mustang Cobra Jet
There was a period during the 1960s and 1970s when muscle car engines were given hilariously understated power outputs. The biggest liar of them all? That’d be the Mustang Cobra Jet.
It came packing a performance version of the Blue Oval’s 428 cubic-inch big-block V8, officially making 335hp. In reality, it made 410. Yep, an additional 75 horses Ford neglected to mention.
Chevrolet Camaro (fourth-gen)
Stock LS1-powered Chevrolet Camaros from the car’s fourth generation are supposed to make 305hp at the crank. The reality is most put out around that figure at the wheels.
The same goes for the Pontiac Firebird, which used the same LS1. The same LS1 was used in the C5 Chevrolet Corvette with some very slight differences, but that time a more accurate official power output of 350hp was given.
What other understated engines can you think of? Let us know in the comments!
Comments
If only my Hyundai i10 made more than the advertised 69 BHP. Sigh.
Well 69 is the only dinner for two
i think it does even less atm
My car (the daily) made 52hp from factory. 34 years ago. Somehow I’m gonna guess that right now she’s pushin abooouuuuut 35hp. But I can still do a burnout :)
Dodge Neon SRT-4?
Yup. Neons srt4 was claimed 215bhp from factory, but it actually made 230whp
Some people in the manufacturers’ HQs are like “Blahh, let’s still look gentle and serious but give people some extra joy of their car!” and don’t get fired thrown out of the window
put an employee falling out of the window meme here
Love love love my Camaro!! It feels faster than it is even with the 6 speed LS1.
Love the 4th gen, my Dad would bring them home from the dealership if there was one on the lot. And we would go for a hoon. He wants the new one with a flappy paddle gearbox, but the smile on his face driving a manual is priceless…
Ford did a lot of that, they would run the car up to halfway through the rev range, and stop and say that was its power output.
Sneaky bastards.
Ferrari F40 might be a good addition to this
My old Corolla was advertised as 58kw and a 13.4sec 0-100kmh. Thirty years later and with some very fast shifts I recorded a 12.1sec 0-100kmh. Maybe Toyota was lying about the 58kw
I hope they lied about the ST202 Celica :P but i doubt it
Shelby “Almost” 500
Professionally tested by Top Gear
ok well no because from what i could tell they dyno tested it and did not convert it from whp and it was missing 50hp which is exactly how much it should have
What about a list of cars that lied in the other way? Like for example the Audi R8 V8 which had a lot less than its claimed 420hp.
Do you have any citation whatsoever for that statement?
prove it please