The Porsche Taycan Turbo's Range Is Only 201 Miles According To The EPA
Ever since the Porsche Taycan was teased as the Mission E concept way back in 2015, it’s been hailed as the electric car to really take on Tesla.
Central to that is the amount of range that the Porsche offers on a full charge. 300 miles or so is the ballpark, and that exact figure was what Porsche affirmed when the Mission E was launched. But, in the US EPA emissions test at least, the Taycan Turbo didn’t get anywhere near that figure.
In fact, the EPA test said its range was just 201 miles. Porsche was obviously shocked by this, as it conducted its own tests to prove that, in the right conditions, you could get much closer to the 300-mile range first promised. The Taycan’s US result looks even worse when you consider it has a shorter EPA range than the Nissan Leaf, Chevrolet Bolt, Jaguar I-Pace and all iterations of Tesla’s three models – and it has a larger pricetag than all of those cars.
Porsche went to AMCI Testing, a California company that’s independent and ‘committed to unbiased, comparative evaluations of automotive products’. It found that owners would, on average, be able to travel 275 miles between charges, with an estimated city-only range of 288 miles. That’s a lot closer to the 300-mile promise, and almost the same as the Taycan Turbo’s 279-mile WLTP range in Europe.
But, if you’re buying a Taycan in America, it’ll say a range of 201 miles on the car’s documents.
So why are the emissions tests different? How come there are 79 miles of range separating the EPA and WLTP results? Well, it’s to do with the types of driving the tests are based on; WLTP focuses more on suburban driving, as that’s what Europeans are more likely to do, while EPA includes more highway driving at faster speeds. The EPA test is thought to be stricter overall, too.
Still, we expect Porsche to roll out updates during the car’s lifespan to improve its 201-mile EPA range claim.
Comments
The EPA testing also involves full throttle acceleration, which WLTP doesn’t really take into account. WLTP assumes that realistically you won’t do full throttle acceleration in everyday use, but the highway onramps in the USA are much shorter than in Europe, so it makes sense that EPA testing would take that into account. Obviously that’s going to take a massive hit on the EV range. Then again, if Porsche claims 300 miles range, it’s a massive disappointment that it doesn’t manage to reach that in any testing procedure, not even WLTP which usually gives very good results for EVs.
And that’s why bois we don’t trust the corporations on their own testing.
We wait for independent reviews
Still tho, WTLP of 280 miles is pretty good.
They lied. Again. VW’s nose must be longer than the distance to the moon and back.
Read again
I honestly don’t care if they lied. It’s not like ICE cars that are as fast as this have good gas mileage lol. But being an EV I did hope for a tad bit more
Actually it DOES make a difference since the push gor electrification is for greater efficiency with speed as a side effect. 100 miles of range is a huge deal for someone buying an electric car, especially when the ICE market can have so many better offerings in other aspects and in range as well. Like why buy a model 3 and get 300 miles when you can buy a prius and get 400? Why buy a Porche Taycan and get 200 miles when you can buy a Challenger Hellcat and get 300? See how this works? 200 miles of range is pitiful in the USA, especially when you consider Porsche doesnt have a whole fast charging network like Tesla or a ICE engine to help when range anxiety kicks in everytime you pass up a charging station.
Teslarati are going to have a field day over this
Any website that has Tesla in its name is cancer.
Fact.
Maybe the government wants to push Tesla? puts on tinfoil hat
i love that weird Al reference
this is amaizing post . best blog
rent a car pakistan
https://vipcars.com.pk/vehicles/
Da fak is this haha