Lexus GS F Review: The Accidental N/A V8 Hero

With ‘just’ 471bhp to its name, the Lexus GS F is way down on power compared to its German rivals. But that’s precisely the reason it appeals
Lexus GS F Review: The Accidental N/A V8 Hero

Pros

Cons

471bhp. Not so long ago, that’d be a pretty healthy output to have in a mid-sized four-door, wouldn’t it? But over the last few years, things have gotten rather silly in the horsepower department for super saloons. We’re living in a time when the Mercedes-AMG E63 - soon to be replaced with an even more powerful model - puts out anything up to 577bhp, while the last hurrah BMW M5 Competition Edition puts out a frankly silly 592bhp.

So these days, 471bhp doesn’t sound like that much, but that’s how much the Lexus GS F wades into battle with, around 100bhp less than the likes of the aforementioned E63 and M5, and a fair way off the (estate only) Audi RS6.

Lexus GS F Review: The Accidental N/A V8 Hero

I don’t think this is a conscious effort from Lexus to make a statement about the horsepower war raging amongst its German rivals. Rather, it’s about as much as the company’s 5.0-litre, naturally-aspirated V8 can make without resorting to the kind of turbo power Audi, BMW and Mercedes has. That’d cost a hell of a lot of money to develop, for what is an incredibly niche product for the Toyota luxury brand.

However, as much as us petrolheads crave masses of power, the amount of poke from these cars has gotten utterly stupid. If you’ve ever driven an RS6, a car actually slightly less powerful than its predecessor, you’ll know you’ve maybe got a couple of seconds of wide open throttle to play with before you have to back off.

Lexus GS F Review: The Accidental N/A V8 Hero

The Lexus, whether intentionally or unintentionally (I suspect the latter), sticks two fingers at the Germans and their willy waving horsepower war, with a sensible amount of power you can actually use and enjoy on the road. With a 0-62mph time of 4.6 seconds it is still quick, just not quite as brisk as the others. And since it’s the only one that’s still naturally-aspirated, the power it does offer is available in an instant, accompanied by a cracking soundtrack.

With peak torque at 4800rpm and peak power at 7100rpm, this is an engine you find yourself gunning up to its 7300rpm redline frequently. And as with most powerful N/A engines that require frequent fraternisation with the redline, the noise means you don’t really care.

Lexus GS F Review: The Accidental N/A V8 Hero

The V8 lets out a howl at 4000rpm, almost like it’s trying to imitate the fabulous 4.7-litre V8 that’s nearing the end of its life over at Maserati. It could do with a little more volume, though. Even in Sport+ mode, it’s too muted, and externally shot video footage shows that the F’s exhaust note disappears into the wind mere seconds after it’s torn past the camera.

Despite the low exterior volume, that revvy V8 simply dominates the whole driving experience, but that’s not to say the chassis is hopeless. Show the GS F a set of bends, and you’re shown a car that’s taught enough without being harsh and skittish, endowed with more than enough grip, and exudes a feeling of brisk sophistication.

Lexus GS F Review: The Accidental N/A V8 Hero

The steering’s good too - feedback’s decent, it feels consistent, and it’s just about quick enough in the angrier drive modes. Do I wish the rear moved around a little more? Sure, but having a relatively modest 390lb ft which doesn’t arrive in its fullest form until high in the rev range is never going to translate into a car that lights up the rears under power willy nilly.

Lexus GS F Review: The Accidental N/A V8 Hero

There are some more pressing issues with the GS F, though. As is the case with the RC F coupe, the seven-speed gearbox is borderline infuriating. It’s never quite on the ball in auto mode, and is sluggish and downright stubborn when you’re downshifting using the paddles.

What’s more, despite the power deficit to those Germans and a fairly simple chassis (you get a torque-vectoring differential but only passive dampers) the GS F is £70,594, not a whole lot less than an M5.

Lexus GS F Review: The Accidental N/A V8 Hero

Worst of all is the mouse/joystick thing you use to navigate the infotainment system. It’s hilariously bad, and makes entering an address as easy as playing pin the tail on the donkey while blind drunk. And wearing boxing gloves.

But here’s the thing: that price is a better deal than you might think, as unlike similar stuff from Audi, BMW and Mercedes, there isn’t a myriad of expensive options to mull over - there are just two. Almost everything - from the fabulously comfortable 10-way adjustable seats to the G-meter/laptimer gubbins - comes as standard.

Lexus GS F Review: The Accidental N/A V8 Hero

As we’ve already discussed, the drop in power isn’t an issue either. A car like this really doesn’t need an engine that knocks on the door of 600bhp. In fact, if the Audi RS6 and cars of that ilk suddenly switched to more characterful N/A engines and dropped 100bhp or so, I’d be a happy man.

Remote video URL

That isn’t going to happen, so why aren’t we giving Lexus a little more credit for keeping the naturally-aspirated flame burning a little while longer, when every other rival car has switched to forced induction? The sweet-sounding, surprisingly wafty GS F gets a nod of respect from me - it’s an accidental V8 hero, and a refreshing alternative to every other hot saloon out there.

Sponsored Posts

Comments

Kevin Allen Anugerah

Down on power = less stress to the engine = better reliability

09/25/2016 - 15:33 |
13 | 2

Lexus basically retain their bullet-proof crown.

09/26/2016 - 21:31 |
2 | 0

I wouldn’t necessarily say that is true. How the power is applied and what inside the motor is just as important. You can have a 500 horsepower motor that is just as reliable is a 200 horsepower motor because it has better internals. I mean take for example my car as a 3.2 liter motor and makes 333 horsepower. it has over 80,000 miles on it and the only thing that has ever been replaced on that motor from the records is a seal for the Vanos unit. aside from that it’s just been normal spark plugs and air filters and oil changes. and yet I have another car that is a 5.0 liter V8 with 200000 miles that needs to be completely rebuilt even though it only made 195 horsepower stock. yes more power gives more stress but what’s inside the motor is a very important factor and reliability.

09/28/2016 - 00:42 |
1 | 0
RoyP

I dunno who takes this photos but he deserves a raise

09/25/2016 - 15:37 |
49 | 1
RoyP

In reply to by RoyP

Oh and great article Matt

09/25/2016 - 15:37 |
15 | 1
Deadpool (Cam's much sexier twin) (Official Demon Fangirl)

“471bhp doesn’t sound like that much”

09/25/2016 - 15:41 |
135 | 1

And I thought that was on a murican thing to say, cos everyone and their dog owns a V8 over there.

09/25/2016 - 18:08 |
4 | 2

Yeah, people need to realize that even 100 bhp is plenty for normal usage.

09/26/2016 - 07:37 |
21 | 1

CT seems to be watching too much 1230video lately.

09/27/2016 - 21:21 |
1 | 0
8putrak

[DELETED]

09/25/2016 - 15:55 |
0 | 0
Anonymous

someone needs to either put turbos on this or swap a gt86 with its v8.

09/25/2016 - 15:55 |
6 | 1
Outlaw 1

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

I offer my BRZ for this swap haha

09/25/2016 - 17:58 |
2 | 0
8putrak

Nice review but sadly no one is buying this.

09/25/2016 - 15:56 |
9 | 1
Chewbacca_buddy (McLaren squad)(VW GTI Clubsport)(McLaren 60

V8 POWWWWWAAAAAAA

09/25/2016 - 15:59 |
1 | 0
lafars

are horsepowerwars worth it in this class of vehicles?

i don’t think it is

09/25/2016 - 16:10 |
0 | 0
DL🏁

I never liked this car, to my eye the design is overdone and objectively its too far behind the German competitors, but these photos managed to make this car look great to me and the article made me respect it more than I did
Thanks, Matt!

09/25/2016 - 16:16 |
9 | 0

The german’s design is a lot better done and well-proportioned. But is does bring some character with its ugliness :D

09/25/2016 - 18:28 |
2 | 4
Mr.PurpleV12

Would buy

09/25/2016 - 17:16 |
1 | 0