This 89hp Mazda Was The Perfect Car For The World's Best Driving Road
Pros
Cons
Before I received the email outlining this trip, I knew pretty much squat about the Azores. Well, I knew it was a bunch of islands in the Atlantic, but that was about it. I didn’t realise quite how far off the coast of Portugal they actually are - the archipelago is getting on for halfway between mainland Europe and the most easterly bit of Canada. I had no idea the islands were formed by volcanoes, making the scenery rather dramatic. Nor did I know that the largest island - Sao Miguel - is home to some of the best driving roads on the planet.
So, upon landing in Ponta Delgada - the most populous settlement in the Azores - what kind of car do you suppose might be waiting for me? A Porsche Boxster, perhaps? The weather’s pretty changeable here, so how about an all-wheel drive supercar like an Audi R8? A hot hatch like the Honda Civic Type R might be pretty good, actually. However, the answer is none of the above. It’s a Mazda, and not even an MX-5. It’s the Ford Fiesta-rivalling Mazda 2, in 89bhp form. Ah.
But there’s a very good reason I’m in something that doesn’t breathe fire and decimate rubber at the merest tickle of the throttle. The trip is one installment in a series of road trips organised by Mazda called Epic Drives, intended to show that all its cars, regardless of output, are damn good to be behind the wheel of. So with an open mind, I twist the key in the ignition barrel to awaken 89 of the 1.5-litre, naturally-aspirated inline-four’s rampant horses.
The gentle bimble out of Ponta Delgada reveals a town with a curious architectural mix. The vast concrete and glass structures of hotels and offices plus the industrial lots of the town’s massive port blend not so seamlessly with pristine white buildings dating back hundreds of years, flanking cobbled roads with a complete lack of pavements. Seriously, a lot of the properties here open straight onto the road - we’ve been forewarned to drive through populated areas with caution, lest we mow anyone down.
It’s not a big town, though, so I’m soon leaving the strange mingle of buildings behind and snaking up a fiddly little stretch of tarmac lined by trees. It’s only now that it occurs to me that the 2’s driving position is spot on. Why hadn’t I noticed it before? Because it fits like a glove. A driving position tends to stick out if it’s bad - cough Abarth 595 cough - rather than good, and there’s nothing wrong with the 2’s ergonomics.
I’ve been climbing for some time, but it’s not until I stop at a creepy abandoned hotel - opened for just one year before closing down and being left to rot - that I see what the trees have been hiding. Climbing up the still-carpeted staircase - being careful not to take a wrong turn and fall down an empty lift shaft - I venture out onto the roof, where a ridiculously good view of Lagoa das Sete Cidades unfolds before me. What I’m looking at is a massive pair of lakes sitting in the crater of a dormant volcano, and it might just be the most beautiful bit of scenery I’ve ever clapped eyes on.
Back in the car, the climb doesn’t stop. It’s now that the next piece of the puzzle makes itself apparent: the engine. The default position for most manufacturers when making a circa 90bhp engine these days seems to be a dinky 1.0-litre inline-three with a little turbocharger attached, but you’ll find no such thing in the Mazda. In a move that’s now looking like a masterstroke, Mazda has ignored the downsizing trend entirely, and has gone its own way by sticking with comparatively large naturally-aspirated units.
Mazda must be feeling smug right now as aggressively downsized engines struggle to get anywhere near their claimed economy figures in the real world, but the benefits go well beyond efficiency. With inline-threes being inherently unbalanced, their crankshafts are festooned with counterweights, sapping responsiveness. No such issue with the 1.5-litre N/A inline-four in the Mazda 2, which is a revvy, eager not-so-little thing.
The lack of low-down grunt does leave you with a dilemma, though. Do you leave it in third gear and struggle out of the lower speed corners, or favour second and have it buzzing near the limiter much of the time?
Thankfully, knocking through the gears on the 2 isn’t a chore, as the car’s gearbox is much the same as you’d find in a Mazda MX-5, meaning you get a short and deliciously precise throw with every change.
Having snaked back down toward sea level around enough hairpins for me to lose count, a few less interesting straighter sections await, followed by another climb. It’s now that that last piece of the Mazda 2 equation makes itself known: the super sweet chassis.
Now I know where the hatchback’s easy-to-reach limits are, there’s a hilarious howl of tyre squeal on every corner. There isn’t masses of front-end grip, but it’s a neat and tidy little car when you throw it around, with accurate, feelsome steering that lets you place the nose wherever you want.
"On these roads, the Mazda 2's modest output is a blessing rather than a curse"
It’s well balanced and almost playful, too. Back off mid corner, and you get the slightest inkling that the back end wants to rotate forwards.
I’m loving every minute of this drive despite the limited power on offer. In fact, the 2’s modest output is a blessing rather than a curse - you can really hammer this thing to within an inch of its life while remaining at perfectly safe and legal speeds. And in any case, these roads are so damn twisty, if you took something powerful here, you might find yourself a little frustrated.
So is it mission accomplished for Mazda in proving that even the humblest of its products is properly sorted in the driving department? Yes, but there’s a pretty big caveat.
While I’ll happily doff my metaphorical hat to Mazda for its ethos that sees all of its cars imbued with commendable driving competence, in the case of the 2, it draws awkward attention to the fact that there isn’t a more powerful version. It’s such a wicked chassis with beautiful steering that you’re left wondering just how good the 2 would be with a little more power, slightly stiffer suspension and wider, stickier rubber. I don’t think it’d feel ‘too much’ on these kinds of roads, either.
The imagination is left to run all the more wild given that Mazda so recently made sporty cars (outside of the MX-5) like the 3 and 6 MPS, only to cull them from the range a few years ago. So yes, even the smallest, least expensive Mazdas do drive exceptionally, but as the ‘Epic Drive’ draws to a close with a relaxed trundle on the dual carriageway into Ponta Delgada, all I can think is: ‘go on Mazda, make a faster one. You know you want to…’
Comments
This is incredible it just goes to show that you don’t need large power to have fun.
Yeah and you don’t need BRAPAPAPAPAPAPA STUTUTUTUTUTUTU to have fun. (Rx7, rotary and Phil fanboys triggered)
Yep agreed. How you have can still have fun with small cars.
True, you just need the right road
I agree. Proof that you don’t need eleventy-bajillion horsepower to have fun whilst behind the wheel of a car.
More of these please
This shows that small, underpowered hatchbacks are fun! 😁
Portugal, F*ck Yeah.
Hey! My family came from the Açores! It’s great to see someone from here enjoyed it (even if it was for a test drive through its mountains).
As the owner of a small and (relatively) underpowered hatch, I wholeheartedly agree!
A hybrid rotary engined option in future perhaps?
It’s not a surprise that the Mazda 2 drives the way it does. After all, the whole suspension is built from Ford Fiesta components (which is inherently a good thing) and the motor, altough very curbed, is the same you’d find in the base model Mazda MX-5.
There’s one thing I noticed about small N/A engines in economy cars yet, and that’s that the fuel economy is terrible in real world conditions. The 1.25 engine of the Ford Fiesta and the 1.8 engine of the Ford Mondeo (just to name a few) all drink far more than what the datasheet states. As such, I very much doubt the 4.5 l/100 km figure that Mazda claims. What is the fuel consumption you reached in normal driving?
Other than that, I cannot praise Mazda enough. Every car they put on sale since 2010 is beautiful, nice to drive and economical. What else would you want?
I have to agree. But isn’t it logical for turbo cars to have worse mpg than in tests???
Really? I always thought it was the heavily turbocharged engines (like those 1.0 boosted 3-cylinder engines) that do much worse in real life.
A frienf of mine manages 5L/100 in his 1.0 focus, with city driving involved. It works really well as long as you dont get on it. I myself have driven the new 100hp fiesta and i really did like the ecoboost i3. On the other hand the 1.0 TSi was an awful experience, loud slow and thirsty
See, I thought that too but my Micra frequently hits above it’s claimed economy. It is a relatively large engine in a small car, however I’m not sure the difference could be offset by that fact. (Nissan claims 44mpg for the Sport SR, the trip computer reads in the low 50s. My calculated average across one tank is 48.1mpg)
I own a Mazda 2 just like in the article. 2016 model though, not 2017. It still with the same 89bhp engine and chassis. Just some minor cosmetic changes were applied. I must agree with you, suspension is spot on, and gives the car it’s more fun characteristics.
Regarding consumption, I cannot compare with smaller engine vehicles as I only own this car. Before buying I was contemplating the Renault Clio Tce. 3 cylinder 0.9L 90bhp Turbo. But I came to the conclusion that running costs of a more relaxed engine (as it needs less revs to match power) in a slightly lighter car (1050 vs 1082kg laiden weight), would be cheaper in the long run.
Mazda states that consumption on the Mazda 2 (1.5L 90PS 5spd manual petrol) is 39.9 mpg (5.9 l/100 km) city, 63.6 mpg (3.7 l/100 km) highway, and 52.3 mpg (4.5 l/100km) combined. I’m from Malta, and all roads are very city-like… Especially in my day to day commutes with multiple points of stand-still traffic, and no real highways on the islands to speak of. I recently managed an average of 6.5 L/100km (36.2 mpg) over 20 something days of careful driving. I think that’s the best I could ever get with these driving conditions. I usually level off on an average of 6.9 l/100km (34 mpg) with not-so-very-careful driving and a heavy right foot.
I honestly don’t think I’m really too far off with these numbers, as the manufacturer always states the best possible numbers they could get based on calculations, not actual driving, and I believe my scenario is very close to be called City driving only. Having said that, if anyone has the Renault Clio Tce 3 cylinder 0.9L 90bhp Turbo for comparison’s sake (which is the closest hot-hatch match I can think of) kindly give us your feedback on this to have a nice comparison of at least 2 cars in the real world vs stated figures! :)
PS: To save you the work of looking up consumption values, that car should do (on paper) 37.3 mpg (6.3 l/100km) city, 54.7 mpg (4.3 l/100km) highway, and 47 mpg (5 l/100km) combined.
Sources:
https://goo.gl/CE7r5b
https://goo.gl/Xz4STf
Its like the legends say - You can either have fun driving a slow car fast or be paranoid driving a fast car slow.
I really hope someday Mazda come to Brazil.