Seat Leon Cupra 300 4WD Review: Why I’d Rather Stick With Its FWD Sibling
Pros
Cons
I’ve long had a soft spot for the Seat Leon Cupra. I maintain it’s still a thoroughly tempting option even though its place at the top of the hot hatch food chain is now under threat from the Ford Focus RS plus the outgoing and incoming Honda Civic Type Rs, and now, Seat has made some improvements to ensure it’s better than ever.
The Spanish company’s Sport division has added 10bhp, and, err, that’s about it. But here’s the thing: while the ladies and gents in Barcelona were at it, they whipped up an all-new four-wheel drive version.
In a move that initially confused us, Seat announced that the new ‘4Drive’ Cupra would only be available as an estate, and with a DSG automatic gearbox. But it’s all to do with the tooling and expertise already being in place for the Leon ‘ST’ estate-based Xperience, the only other four-wheel drive Leon in production. Yes, you can buy a four-wheel drive VW Golf R as either a hatch or estate with the same MQB platform, but MQB isn’t just a playbox from which any VW Group brand can take whichever toy it fancies - it’s not quite that simple.
So, boring production line stuff out of the way, what’s it actually like to drive? Rapid, is the answer. Seriously rapid.
It has the same eager, surprisingly revvy ‘EA888’ 2.0-litre inline-four offering up 297bhp, but four-wheel drive traction plus a launch control function does wonders for the Cupra’s acceleration capabilities. 0-62mph is dispatched in just 4.9 seconds, down from 5.8.
But it’s not just the off-the-line pace: whenever you put your foot down you can guarantee the 4Drive Cupra will hook up and shoot you off into the distance with vigour. There’s no waiting for excitable front wheels to stop scrabbling and regain traction here.
Lateral grip meanwhile is impressive to the point that your face will probably give way before the tyres do. Although being a front-biased Haldex system, you’ve probably guessed by now that safe and predictable understeer is waiting for you should you manage to exceed the limit.
The body doesn’t budge a whole lot either, but then it shouldn’t - as with pretty much every Leon Cupra before it, this is one stiffly sprung car.
So it’s way faster than the front-wheel drive version, grips harder in the corners, and doesn’t light up its front tyres at the slightest provocation. So obviously, I’d ignore it and buy the regular front-wheel drive car. Wait, what?
Hear me out, as this is one of those classic, ever-so-slightly clichéd instances of the inferior car being the more interesting one. This is all reminiscent of when we tested ‘our’ VW Golf GTI Clubsport against the Golf R - the Cupra 4Drive’s German cousin. These days, 297bhp isn’t a power output that automatically ‘requires’ four-wheel drive: the trick VAQ differential in the front-wheel drive car - itself essentially half a Haldex four-wheel drive system - can handle it, but only just. And the ‘just’ bit is crucial.
It’s that feeling of being on the edge of what’s capable that’s so exciting. I like the scrabbling front wheels. I love the feeling of the power being shuffled from wheel to wheel, livening up the Cupra’s otherwise lifeless steering. And I love the way you can feel the VAQ system tug the front end into line.
You get much more of a sense of what the car’s doing to get you around the corner, making you feel far more involved. The 4Drive machine on the other hand doesn’t require much effort at all to drive very quickly, and just isn’t as thrilling.
The draw of four-wheel drive grip and security means the Leon Cupra will appeal to a lot of buyers, particularly in the often wet UK - few cars will be able to touch this when the roads are well lubricated. At £34,485 it costs under £1000 less to buy outright than the VW Golf R estate, but you do get more stuff as standard - adaptive dampers are standard on the Cupra for instance. But the Golf claws it back if you’re leasing: at present, you’ll get a better deal on the VW.
There’s no doubt 4Drive Cupra compliments the hot Leon range nicely, but for me? I’d take the much cheaper, much more exciting front-wheel drive car without question. If you’re really into driving, I’d recommend you do the same.
Comments
Less is more, isn’t it?
This is what I’ve been saying for a long time, 4WD (especially in hot hatchbacks) isn’t always better, FWD is usually much more exciting to drive. Yes, 4WD is quicker, but not necessarily better
Focus RS drifts away
If it ever rains or snows where you live, 4WD is the choice. I am never going to own a FWD car again in my life.
after driving around in my subaru for about 6 months, I agree. FWD is underrated
Meh. I rather want a RWD hatch from VAG.
RWD hatches are bad. They have zero amount of space
Despite the arguably better driving pleasure, the disadvantages overweigh in a concept like this. A longitudinally mounted engine requires a fair amount of space and so does the transmission behind it. BMWs often have that problem - the interiour is more cramped than in other cars because of the wide transmission hump required. Even BMW, who is holding on to RWD like no other, will switch to FWD for the next iteration of the 1-series.
Why no supra??
Supra ≠ hatchback
If you have ever wanted a gtr but you have kids, you can now go on the cupra estate 4wd
One of the best hot hatches on the market. I’d still prefer 4WD (or RWD) once there is more than 350ish Nm of torque, though. May be less fun, but makes power more usable
Mother Nature approves
[DELETED]
I totally agree with you Matt. After driving around in my Subaru Legacy that has all the grip all the time, it’s fun to drive one of my minivans that can break traction when I want it to.
I have a strange desire to buy a Civic Type R and spank a Subaru WRX STI on the racetrack
Golf R rival?