The Caterham 21: A #blogpost On The Seven's Forgotten Sister

Caterham did something other than the Seven?
Yep.
This is the Caterham 21, the only other car Caterham ever made.
It was pretty much a more comfortable, everyday-use Seven.

When did that happen?
Between 1994 and 1999.

The Caterham 21: A #blogpost On The Seven's Forgotten Sister

Caterham did something other than the Seven?
Yep.
This is the Caterham 21, the only other car Caterham ever made.
It was pretty much a more comfortable, everyday-use Seven.

When did that happen?
Between 1994 and 1999.

Was it meant to replace the Seven?
No.
The production was already meant to be limited to 200 cars a year.

So, 200 cars a year, for 5 years, that makes for…
Yup.
48 cars.

What? Why?

Remote video URL

Why was it called 21?
Caterham started making Sevens in 1973. This car was born in 1994. Take a look at the years…

Yep, it was presented as a celebration of Caterham’s 21 years. But since the goal was to build a car similar to the Lotus 11, the name might have something to do with that too.

Did all of them have that crazy silver look?
No, that was just the aluminum prototype. The production version was made out of fiberglass, and looked like this:

The Caterham 21: A #blogpost On The Seven's Forgotten Sister
The Caterham 21: A #blogpost On The Seven's Forgotten Sister

Hold up… Why do those taillights look familiar?
Erm…

Yup. They're the same.
Yup. They're the same.

Oh, and it doesn’t stop there, either.

The Caterham 21: A #blogpost On The Seven's Forgotten Sister

Enough with the body, was the interior comfortable?
More than the Seven, of course (in the end, that was its goal): It had more creature comforts, such as proper doors, actual glass windows (which as a trade-off didn’t roll down), a dashboard that actually looks like there was some design work behind it, and a soft-top worth its name. Though comfort was still one of its weaker points.

Why so? Isn’t the car a lot wider? Where did all the additional width go?
Well…

Yes, this is for real. You could have a football match on those sills.
Yes, this is for real. You could have a football match on those sills.

Engine-wise?
Aside from a couple of Vauxhall 2.0 and 2.4 RST V8s exceptions, they were fitted with the almost stereotypical Rover K-series (yes, the same you found in the Elise. And in the Atom. And in the Freelander), either as a 1.6 or as a 1.8. Two featured a “Very High-Performance Derivative” (VHPD) specification.

Oh, yeah, and it had one of those cool forward-opening bonnets, which is always a plus.
Oh, yeah, and it had one of those cool forward-opening bonnets, which is…

Any specs?
Plenty.

1.6
0-60: 6.4s
Top Speed: 118mph
Max Power: 115 bhp @ 6000rpm
Max Torque: 107 lbft @ 3000rpm
Specific Output: 72bhp/litre
Power to weight: 177bhp/tonne

1.6SS
0-60: 5.8s
Top Speed: 131mph
Max Power: 138 bhp @ 6000rpm
Max Torque: 115 lbft @ 3000rpm
Specific Output: 87bhp/litre
Power to weight: 213bhp/tonne

1.8VVC
0 - 60 : 5.5s
Top speed : 130mph
Max Power : 151bhp at 7000rpm
Max Torque : 128lb ft at 4500rpm
Specific Output : 84bhp/litre
Power to weight : 232bhp/ton

1.8 VHPD
0 - 60 : 4.5s
Top speed : 135mph
Max Power : 190bhp at 7500rpm
Max Torque : 150lb ft at 5750rpm
Specific Output : 105bhp/litre
Power to weight : 292bhp/ton

How was the sound?
Better than a Viper’s. At least, according to Mike Rutherford from this Men and Motors segment from 1998. If you want to spare yourself some ear-piercing music, skip to 2:06 for the bold claim and some chatting with Jez Coates (Caterham’s technical director) about how they managed that.

Remote video URL

How did that power get to the wheels?
As standard, it had the Ford Type 9 transmission, the one you’d find in a MKIII Capri or a Sierra, though a Caterham-made six-speed gearbox was offered as an option. It also had a limited-slip differential,of course.

So, how was it like to drive?
Probably better than the Seven: the chassis was 50% stiffer and the suspensions were tweaked for a better ride. And while it was bigger and heavier than the Seven it was based on, we’re still talking about less than 4 meters and 700kgs (or 1500 pounds, if you’re fond of using the wrong measurements).

So it’s a good racecar?
Very. So much that most of them were GT versions, devoted to racing from 1999 to 2001, though some are still racing to this day, like the GPS Racing team raced the Belcar 24h and won its class (beating a bunch of Lotus Elises too).

The Caterham 21: A #blogpost On The Seven's Forgotten Sister
The Caterham 21: A #blogpost On The Seven's Forgotten Sister

Oh, and then there was the GTO, an R500-engined version. Some specs? 230 hp from a 1.8l, 0-100 in 3,8 seconds, and all in 1994.

The Caterham 21: A #blogpost On The Seven's Forgotten Sister

And, as if it wasn’t mad enough already, it later received the Levante’s V8 (supercharged to 500 hp!).

Wow, I want one now! Too bad it’s a rarity, prices must be sky-high…
Do you really think so? Well, you’re about to be pleasantly surprised: those Caterhams you saw above are actually up for sale, and with prices that rival used Sevens, too!

The Caterham 21: A #blogpost On The Seven's Forgotten Sister
The Caterham 21: A #blogpost On The Seven's Forgotten Sister

If you do buy one, the Caterham 21 has an official owner’s club (weird, I know) at caterham21.com, which contains a lot of useful and interesting information about them.

What do you think about this forgotten Elise rival? Leave your thoughts in the comments!

I hope you enjoyed this post, if you did please leave an upvote and consider following me. If you feel like giving me a couple tips on how to improve, please do, it’s very appreciated.

Don’t forget to tag whoever you think might enjoy this blogpost! As always, I appreciate being tagged on any post you feel deserves my attention (and obviously anything Caterham!)

See ya in the next blogpost,
BACTM out.

The Caterham 21: A #blogpost On The Seven's Forgotten Sister

Sponsored Posts

Comments

Anonymous

What could be rarer than a Caterham 21?

02/19/2017 - 02:30 |
0 | 0
Bring a Caterham To MARS

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

A 21 GTO?
A 21.5?

02/19/2017 - 10:16 |
2 | 0
Monty4248

Uh… that’s ain’t the only other car that Cateham has made…

02/19/2017 - 02:44 |
2 | 2
Bring a Caterham To MARS

In reply to by Monty4248

sighs
I meant road legal car.
Well pointed though

02/19/2017 - 10:13 |
2 | 0
Dat Boi

Nice article format, enjoyed it 👍

02/19/2017 - 08:59 |
2 | 2
Jakob

How small is it? The Mondeo tail lights look huge on that thing.

02/19/2017 - 09:00 |
0 | 0
Bring a Caterham To MARS

In reply to by Jakob

As I mentioned, 3.90 meters (didn’t I?)

02/19/2017 - 10:16 |
0 | 0
PN K

Someone explain this logic, please.

02/19/2017 - 09:05 |
4 | 0
Bring a Caterham To MARS

In reply to by PN K

Explain it to me too, I’m curious.

02/19/2017 - 10:15 |
0 | 0
Mr Red

Only reason i know about this car is test drive 5. :)

02/19/2017 - 09:18 |
0 | 0
Bring a Caterham To MARS

In reply to by Mr Red

I saw that while searching for pictures!

02/19/2017 - 10:17 |
2 | 0
Anonymous

gotta love me some british maths

02/19/2017 - 13:11 |
4 | 0
Bring a Caterham To MARS

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

And some British parts recycling

02/19/2017 - 13:24 |
6 | 0
Kevin 15

Ain’t that bad if we swap the engine for performance’s sake. The design is flawless, probably suitable for aerodynamic features

02/19/2017 - 17:29 |
2 | 0
Bring a Caterham To MARS

In reply to by Kevin 15

190hp for 700kgs isn’t half bad though

02/19/2017 - 18:24 |
0 | 0
HfromB

Damn

I want one now XD

02/28/2017 - 12:38 |
0 | 0
Bring a Caterham To MARS

In reply to by HfromB

It’s really nice to hear!
It means I did a good job

02/28/2017 - 16:49 |
2 | 0
Peter (Hellcat squad)🔰

So…. where do i get mine…

03/06/2017 - 15:03 |
0 | 0

Great Britain or Germany, it seems. Or nearer to you if you’re lucky enough to find one

03/06/2017 - 16:31 |
0 | 0